Research, Technology, Tools, Usability

1 in 4 Users Can’t Google

No, this is not about a failure rate while using Google. This is about a failure rate to even find Google. Jakob Nielsen has published a startling statistic:

If you thought it’s easy to get to Google, think again. In our current round of usability research, only 76% of users who expressed a desire to run a Google search were successful. In other words, 1/4 of users who wanted to use Google couldn’t do so. (Instead, they either completely failed to get to any search engine or ended up running their query on a different search engine — usually whatever type-in field happened to be at hand.)

This study was aimed at above-average Internet users. Of four above-average Internet users, one would be stumped as to how to run a Google search.

Now, let’s review as we try to catch our collective breath.

Users are weird. I’m one of them, so I can say this. I’m sure I do things that would make a Web designer apoplectic or dyspeptic. But this statistic has me really scratching my head. And that’s Jakob’s point. Web designers, planners, executives, and technologists have so much more knowledge of their products and online in general that they are incapable of bridging the gap in their minds, and need to interact with users to see firsthand what their users are like.

However, there may be something else going on here. As Kleenex, Jacuzzi, Frisbee, Band-Aid, and Scotch Tape have learned, there is a class of words that become eponyms (or, in the parlance, proprietary eponyms). These terms have non-specific meaning, and Google may be one of these for advanced Internet users. Therefore, people may “Google” in the eponymous sense, and still use another search engine. As users, they are functioning just fine.

About Kent Anderson

I am the CEO/Publisher of the Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, Inc. Prior to this, I was an executive at the New England Journal of Medicine. I also was Director of Medical Journals at the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Discussion

2 Responses to “1 in 4 Users Can’t Google”

  1. That’s actually a very sound analysis of the situation I think. I refuse to believe that the quarter of advanced internet users “can’t” find/use google.

    I presume that this study was aimed at North American internet users?

    Posted by bookhling | May 15, 2008, 11:59 pm
  2. I think what this may actually be saying is “1 in 4 users can’t use the browser’s address bar”. I recently attended a pre-conference workshop at a hotel, and the next day assumed that the conference was at the same hotel. The concierge informed me that it wasn’t, and someone else had just asked him the same question. He was standing in front of a computer so I said, “why don’t you Google it, and then we’ll both know”. He popped open a browser window, and it came up with the MSN search page. The concierge typed “Google” into the MSN search, then used Google to find the conference.

    I know many people who consider themselves to be fairly competent computer users, but would be completely lost if I deleted the shortcuts from their desktop. Similarly, I suspect that many users have Google on their browser toolbar, or set as their homepage. I have also noticed that a substantial percentage of those people, when asked to go to “somewebsite.com” will type the URL into Google, not the browser’s address bar.

    Posted by Toby | May 23, 2008, 11:54 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Side Dishes by Stewart Wills

Find Posts by Category

Find Posts by Date

May 2008
S M T W T F S
« Apr   Jun »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

The Scholarly Kitchen on Twitter

SSP_LOGO
The mission of the Society for Scholarly Publishing (SSP) is "[t]o advance scholarly publishing and communication, and the professional development of its members through education, collaboration, and networking." SSP established The Scholarly Kitchen blog in February 2008 to keep SSP members and interested parties aware of new developments in publishing.
......................................
The Scholarly Kitchen is a moderated and independent blog. Opinions on The Scholarly Kitchen are those of the authors. They are not necessarily those held by the Society for Scholarly Publishing nor by their respective employers.
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 462 other followers