<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Paradox of Online Journals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2008/07/18/online-journal-paradox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2008/07/18/online-journal-paradox/</link>
	<description>What&#039;s Hot &#38; What&#039;s Cooking in Scholarly Publishing - from the Society for Scholarly Publishing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 11:43:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Online journals &#8211; curse or blessing? &#171; Jan Husdal</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2008/07/18/online-journal-paradox/#comment-3798</link>
		<dc:creator>Online journals &#8211; curse or blessing? &#171; Jan Husdal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 10:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.wordpress.com/?p=286#comment-3798</guid>
		<description>[...] poignant reminder of my post on the Catch 22 of Academic Publishing. It was my comment on the post The Paradox of Online Journals on the blog named The Scholarly Kitchen. The post was referring to a study published in Science [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] poignant reminder of my post on the Catch 22 of Academic Publishing. It was my comment on the post The Paradox of Online Journals on the blog named The Scholarly Kitchen. The post was referring to a study published in Science [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Online journals &#8211; curse or blessing? &#171; husdal.com</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2008/07/18/online-journal-paradox/#comment-3795</link>
		<dc:creator>Online journals &#8211; curse or blessing? &#171; husdal.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 22:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.wordpress.com/?p=286#comment-3795</guid>
		<description>[...] poignant reminder of my post on the Catch 22 of Academic Publishing. It was my comment on the post The Paradox of Online Journals on the blog named The Scholarly Kitchen. The post was referring to a study published in Science [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] poignant reminder of my post on the Catch 22 of Academic Publishing. It was my comment on the post The Paradox of Online Journals on the blog named The Scholarly Kitchen. The post was referring to a study published in Science [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Online journals &#8211; curse or blessing? &#171; husdal.com</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2008/07/18/online-journal-paradox/#comment-3343</link>
		<dc:creator>Online journals &#8211; curse or blessing? &#171; husdal.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 01:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.wordpress.com/?p=286#comment-3343</guid>
		<description>[...] poignant reminder of my post on the Catch 22 of Academic Publishing. It was my comment on the post The Paradox of Online Journals on the blog named The Scholarly Kitchen. The post was referring to a study published in Science [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] poignant reminder of my post on the Catch 22 of Academic Publishing. It was my comment on the post The Paradox of Online Journals on the blog named The Scholarly Kitchen. The post was referring to a study published in Science [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Open Access and Global Participation in Science &#171; The Scholarly Kitchen</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2008/07/18/online-journal-paradox/#comment-2378</link>
		<dc:creator>Open Access and Global Participation in Science &#171; The Scholarly Kitchen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 22:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.wordpress.com/?p=286#comment-2378</guid>
		<description>[...] You&#8217;ll recall that Evans was responsible for another controversial article published last summer claiming that online access to the scientific literature results in a narrowing of citations. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You&#8217;ll recall that Evans was responsible for another controversial article published last summer claiming that online access to the scientific literature results in a narrowing of citations. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scientists Reading More, Citing Less &#171; The Scholarly Kitchen</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2008/07/18/online-journal-paradox/#comment-2002</link>
		<dc:creator>Scientists Reading More, Citing Less &#171; The Scholarly Kitchen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 11:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.wordpress.com/?p=286#comment-2002</guid>
		<description>[...] summer I covered an article claiming that more online access to the scientific literature may result in fewer articles being cited.  Several weeks later, I reported on another paper claiming just the opposite, that citation [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] summer I covered an article claiming that more online access to the scientific literature may result in fewer articles being cited.  Several weeks later, I reported on another paper claiming just the opposite, that citation [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transitions &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Citation controversy: does online access change citation practices? - The University of Iowa Libraries</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2008/07/18/online-journal-paradox/#comment-1953</link>
		<dc:creator>Transitions &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Citation controversy: does online access change citation practices? - The University of Iowa Libraries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 17:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.wordpress.com/?p=286#comment-1953</guid>
		<description>[...] Earlier this year, Davis reported on a study by sociologist James Evans suggesting that online access to scientific journals is leading to more recent citations and a narro.... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Earlier this year, Davis reported on a study by sociologist James Evans suggesting that online access to scientific journals is leading to more recent citations and a narro&#8230;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Citation Controversy &#171; The Scholarly Kitchen</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2008/07/18/online-journal-paradox/#comment-1008</link>
		<dc:creator>Citation Controversy &#171; The Scholarly Kitchen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.wordpress.com/?p=286#comment-1008</guid>
		<description>[...] Earlier this year, I reported on a study by sociologist James Evans suggesting that online access to scientific journals is leading to more recent citations and a narro.... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Earlier this year, I reported on a study by sociologist James Evans suggesting that online access to scientific journals is leading to more recent citations and a narro&#8230;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Want Citations? Publish First! &#171; The Scholarly Kitchen</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2008/07/18/online-journal-paradox/#comment-849</link>
		<dc:creator>Want Citations? Publish First! &#171; The Scholarly Kitchen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 11:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.wordpress.com/?p=286#comment-849</guid>
		<description>[...] a previous blog post, The Paradox of Online Journals, we described that scientists may be receiving more signals from their peers through the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a previous blog post, The Paradox of Online Journals, we described that scientists may be receiving more signals from their peers through the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Missing the point? &#171; A Man With A Ph.D.</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2008/07/18/online-journal-paradox/#comment-739</link>
		<dc:creator>Missing the point? &#171; A Man With A Ph.D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 16:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.wordpress.com/?p=286#comment-739</guid>
		<description>[...] Philip Davis at The Scholarly Kitchen may provide the best perspective. He also demonstrates how the Web can [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Philip Davis at The Scholarly Kitchen may provide the best perspective. He also demonstrates how the Web can [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Missing the point?</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2008/07/18/online-journal-paradox/#comment-738</link>
		<dc:creator>Missing the point?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 16:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.wordpress.com/?p=286#comment-738</guid>
		<description>[...] Philip Davis at The Scholarly Kitchen may provide the best perspective. He also demonstrates how the Web can [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Philip Davis at The Scholarly Kitchen may provide the best perspective. He also demonstrates how the Web can [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
