<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Elsevier Math Editor Controversy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2008/11/25/elsevier-math-editor-controversy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2008/11/25/elsevier-math-editor-controversy/</link>
	<description>What&#039;s Hot &#38; What&#039;s Cooking in Scholarly Publishing - from the Society for Scholarly Publishing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 05:01:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Akademik yayın dalavereleri: El Naschie vakası &#124; Kaan Öztürk</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2008/11/25/elsevier-math-editor-controversy/#comment-42217</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Akademik yayın dalavereleri: El Naschie vakası &#124; Kaan Öztürk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 12:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.wordpress.com/?p=1952#comment-42217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Elsevier Math Editor Controversy (The Scholarly Kitchen). [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Elsevier Math Editor Controversy (The Scholarly Kitchen). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elsevier, un éditeur scientifique à boycotter ? &#187; Article &#187; OwniSciences, Société, découvertes et culture scientifique</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2008/11/25/elsevier-math-editor-controversy/#comment-23670</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Elsevier, un éditeur scientifique à boycotter ? &#187; Article &#187; OwniSciences, Société, découvertes et culture scientifique]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 16:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.wordpress.com/?p=1952#comment-23670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] en chef, qui y publie en quelques années la bagatelle de 322 papiers dans cette seule revue (voir quelques chiffres sur ce blog)! Là encore, Elsevier fait le ménage et le journal vient de réouvrir [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] en chef, qui y publie en quelques années la bagatelle de 322 papiers dans cette seule revue (voir quelques chiffres sur ce blog)! Là encore, Elsevier fait le ménage et le journal vient de réouvrir [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suspicious Librarian</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2008/11/25/elsevier-math-editor-controversy/#comment-13551</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Suspicious Librarian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 16:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.wordpress.com/?p=1952#comment-13551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is very interesting.  I am a reference librarian. Several years ago, around 2000-2001, I noticed new periodical titles (which seemed to have been around for a decade or more, bearing corresponding volume and issues numbers) that I had never heard of.  I became suspicious because those periodicals seemed to have a &quot;point of view&quot; that was contrary, or at variance with established scientific knowledge.  I wondered if these might be bogus, but dismissed my doubts as ... paranoia. After all if these journals had been around for this long, they must be legit, right?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is very interesting.  I am a reference librarian. Several years ago, around 2000-2001, I noticed new periodical titles (which seemed to have been around for a decade or more, bearing corresponding volume and issues numbers) that I had never heard of.  I became suspicious because those periodicals seemed to have a &#8220;point of view&#8221; that was contrary, or at variance with established scientific knowledge.  I wondered if these might be bogus, but dismissed my doubts as &#8230; paranoia. After all if these journals had been around for this long, they must be legit, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Controversial Math Journal Relauches: New Editors, Focus on Rigorous Review &#171; The Scholarly Kitchen</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2008/11/25/elsevier-math-editor-controversy/#comment-8871</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Controversial Math Journal Relauches: New Editors, Focus on Rigorous Review &#171; The Scholarly Kitchen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 09:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.wordpress.com/?p=1952#comment-8871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 2008, this journal became the center of a controversy over lax peer-review standards when five articles appeared in the same issue authored by the Editor-in-Chief himself, M.S. El [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2008, this journal became the center of a controversy over lax peer-review standards when five articles appeared in the same issue authored by the Editor-in-Chief himself, M.S. El [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Recherche scientifique (02/12/08) &#171; pintiniblog</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2008/11/25/elsevier-math-editor-controversy/#comment-6413</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Recherche scientifique (02/12/08) &#171; pintiniblog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 18:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.wordpress.com/?p=1952#comment-6413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Elsevier Math Editor Controversy (source: The Scholarly Kitchen, 25/11/08) &#8220;An editor who publishes five of his own articles [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Elsevier Math Editor Controversy (source: The Scholarly Kitchen, 25/11/08) &#8220;An editor who publishes five of his own articles [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Introduction to journals &#171; Motivic stuff</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2008/11/25/elsevier-math-editor-controversy/#comment-3977</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Introduction to journals &#171; Motivic stuff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 19:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.wordpress.com/?p=1952#comment-3977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] crisis, the open access movement, and the evil deeds of certain publishers such as selling complete nonsense or hidden advertising under the cloak of a scientific journal. However, I will only refer to the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] crisis, the open access movement, and the evil deeds of certain publishers such as selling complete nonsense or hidden advertising under the cloak of a scientific journal. However, I will only refer to the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chaos Still Publishing Former Editor&#8217;s Work &#171; The Scholarly Kitchen</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2008/11/25/elsevier-math-editor-controversy/#comment-3740</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chaos Still Publishing Former Editor&#8217;s Work &#171; The Scholarly Kitchen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.wordpress.com/?p=1952#comment-3740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] physics community erupted late last year over the practice of the controversial Editor-in-Chief, Mohamed El Naschie’s practice of publishing his own articles.  While this practice was not new, it came to a head last December, with five of his papers [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] physics community erupted late last year over the practice of the controversial Editor-in-Chief, Mohamed El Naschie’s practice of publishing his own articles.  While this practice was not new, it came to a head last December, with five of his papers [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chaos Journal Preparing to Close Shop? &#171; The Scholarly Kitchen</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2008/11/25/elsevier-math-editor-controversy/#comment-3408</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chaos Journal Preparing to Close Shop? &#171; The Scholarly Kitchen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 18:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.wordpress.com/?p=1952#comment-3408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] physics community erupted late last year over the practice of the controversial editor-in-chief, Mohamed El Naschie’s practice of publishing his own articles.  While this practice was not new, it came to a head last December, with 5 of his papers appearing [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] physics community erupted late last year over the practice of the controversial editor-in-chief, Mohamed El Naschie’s practice of publishing his own articles.  While this practice was not new, it came to a head last December, with 5 of his papers appearing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Another Elsevier Scandal &#171; rookie librarian</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2008/11/25/elsevier-math-editor-controversy/#comment-3347</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Another Elsevier Scandal &#171; rookie librarian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 05:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.wordpress.com/?p=1952#comment-3347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Elsevier Math Editor Controversy in The Scholarly Kitchen [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Elsevier Math Editor Controversy in The Scholarly Kitchen [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chaos Plays Catch-up &#171; The Scholarly Kitchen</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2008/11/25/elsevier-math-editor-controversy/#comment-3077</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chaos Plays Catch-up &#171; The Scholarly Kitchen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 10:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.wordpress.com/?p=1952#comment-3077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] controversy over this journal erupted over a December 2008 issue of Chaos, which included 5 articles published by El Naschie.  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] controversy over this journal erupted over a December 2008 issue of Chaos, which included 5 articles published by El Naschie.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

