<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Self-Publishing Editor to Retire</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2008/11/28/self-publishing-editor-retires/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2008/11/28/self-publishing-editor-retires/</link>
	<description>What&#039;s Hot &#38; What&#039;s Cooking in Scholarly Publishing - from the Society for Scholarly Publishing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:49:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peer-Review Scandal Shakes French Geologists &#171; The Scholarly Kitchen</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2008/11/28/self-publishing-editor-retires/#comment-2210</link>
		<dc:creator>Peer-Review Scandal Shakes French Geologists &#171; The Scholarly Kitchen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 12:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.wordpress.com/?p=2004#comment-2210</guid>
		<description>[...] science field has batted an eyelash.  Meanwhile, the editor of Chaos, Solitons &amp; Fractals, was relieved of his editorial responsibilities when it became apparent that he was short-cutting the peer-review process and publishing his own [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] science field has batted an eyelash.  Meanwhile, the editor of Chaos, Solitons &amp; Fractals, was relieved of his editorial responsibilities when it became apparent that he was short-cutting the peer-review process and publishing his own [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saída de editor não esfria caso de pseudociência e favorecimento &#171; Laudas Críticas</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2008/11/28/self-publishing-editor-retires/#comment-2036</link>
		<dc:creator>Saída de editor não esfria caso de pseudociência e favorecimento &#171; Laudas Críticas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 10:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.wordpress.com/?p=2004#comment-2036</guid>
		<description>[...] importa se os artigos dele foram de fato, submetidos ao peer-review [avaliação prévia pelos pares], como foi questionado por membros da comunidade de física [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] importa se os artigos dele foram de fato, submetidos ao peer-review [avaliação prévia pelos pares], como foi questionado por membros da comunidade de física [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Soft Underbelly of Science &#171; The Scholarly Kitchen</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2008/11/28/self-publishing-editor-retires/#comment-2032</link>
		<dc:creator>The Soft Underbelly of Science &#171; The Scholarly Kitchen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 14:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.wordpress.com/?p=2004#comment-2032</guid>
		<description>[...] whether El Naschie was using his editorial power to further his own ends.  It does not matter whether his articles were, in fact, peer-reviewed, as questioned by members of the mathematical physics community.  There is a perception that El [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] whether El Naschie was using his editorial power to further his own ends.  It does not matter whether his articles were, in fact, peer-reviewed, as questioned by members of the mathematical physics community.  There is a perception that El [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
