Comments on: Elsevier Published Fake Journals http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/05/07/elsevier-published-fake-journals/ What's Hot & What's Cooking in Scholarly Publishing - from the Society for Scholarly Publishing Wed, 17 Mar 2010 01:15:38 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: L’”erreur” d’Elsevier… « pintiniblog http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/05/07/elsevier-published-fake-journals/#comment-6213 L’”erreur” d’Elsevier… « pintiniblog Sun, 27 Dec 2009 21:42:06 +0000 http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=4004#comment-6213 [...] Apparemment, ce n’est pas leur coup d’essai: lire ici [...] [...] Apparemment, ce n’est pas leur coup d’essai: lire ici [...]

]]> By: El lado oscuro de la publicación científica | Bibliotecas Hospitalarias http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/05/07/elsevier-published-fake-journals/#comment-4046 El lado oscuro de la publicación científica | Bibliotecas Hospitalarias Sun, 26 Jul 2009 08:20:36 +0000 http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=4004#comment-4046 [...] caso bastante feo se ha dado con la multinacional Elsevier que ha admitido publicar en los últimos años varias revistas falsas, financiadas por una multinacional farmaceutica, y que publicaba resultados (sorpréndanse) [...] [...] caso bastante feo se ha dado con la multinacional Elsevier que ha admitido publicar en los últimos años varias revistas falsas, financiadas por una multinacional farmaceutica, y que publicaba resultados (sorpréndanse) [...]

]]> By: Elsevier Merck Admit Publishing Fake Journals @ e-Book Reader News http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/05/07/elsevier-published-fake-journals/#comment-3410 Elsevier Merck Admit Publishing Fake Journals @ e-Book Reader News Thu, 04 Jun 2009 18:41:28 +0000 http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=4004#comment-3410 [...] Scholarly Kitchen an alarming report in The Scientist that Elsevier has admitted to publishing “fake journals [...] [...] Scholarly Kitchen an alarming report in The Scientist that Elsevier has admitted to publishing “fake journals [...]

]]> By: Lending Credibility to Fake Journals « The Scholarly Kitchen http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/05/07/elsevier-published-fake-journals/#comment-3386 Lending Credibility to Fake Journals « The Scholarly Kitchen Wed, 03 Jun 2009 10:41:00 +0000 http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=4004#comment-3386 [...] Elsevier-Merck publication scandal made this week’s edition of NPR’s On the Media.  In “Peer Pressure,” radio [...] [...] Elsevier-Merck publication scandal made this week’s edition of NPR’s On the Media.  In “Peer Pressure,” radio [...]

]]> By: A Fake Scientific Literature « Thoughts of a Neo-Academic http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/05/07/elsevier-published-fake-journals/#comment-3207 A Fake Scientific Literature « Thoughts of a Neo-Academic Mon, 18 May 2009 22:50:56 +0000 http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=4004#comment-3207 [...] (5/18): Through this blog, I discovered that Elsevier provided a statement about their actions in this matter.  See for [...] [...] (5/18): Through this blog, I discovered that Elsevier provided a statement about their actions in this matter.  See for [...]

]]> By: Todd Carpenter http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/05/07/elsevier-published-fake-journals/#comment-3109 Todd Carpenter Mon, 11 May 2009 11:57:21 +0000 http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=4004#comment-3109 Interesting that the The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) doesn't address this topic in its recommendations. It speaks at length about what authors need to do about reporting conflicts of interest. It is limited in the responsibilities of the publishers. http://www.icmje.org/index.html The section about advertising (III.H. Advertising) is fairly explicit about a "chinese wall" between content and advertising. In this case, they did a poor job of segmenting the two. How can one separate the ads from the content when the content ARE the ads? Todd Interesting that the The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) doesn’t address this topic in its recommendations. It speaks at length about what authors need to do about reporting conflicts of interest. It is limited in the responsibilities of the publishers.

http://www.icmje.org/index.html

The section about advertising (III.H. Advertising) is fairly explicit about a “chinese wall” between content and advertising. In this case, they did a poor job of segmenting the two. How can one separate the ads from the content when the content ARE the ads?

Todd

]]> By: Elsevier Published Fake Journals « rookie librarian http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/05/07/elsevier-published-fake-journals/#comment-3103 Elsevier Published Fake Journals « rookie librarian Sun, 10 May 2009 10:43:07 +0000 http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=4004#comment-3103 [...] Published Fake Journals Jump to Comments According to the scholarly kitchen, which referred to the magazine The Scientist, publishing giant Elseiver has admitted to publishing [...] [...] Published Fake Journals Jump to Comments According to the scholarly kitchen, which referred to the magazine The Scientist, publishing giant Elseiver has admitted to publishing [...]

]]> By: Elsevier Update « USF Library http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/05/07/elsevier-published-fake-journals/#comment-3090 Elsevier Update « USF Library Fri, 08 May 2009 12:54:21 +0000 http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=4004#comment-3090 [...] Scholarly Kitchen covers the update here, including an interesting snippet from JAMA about how Merck has been trying for a while to recruit [...] [...] Scholarly Kitchen covers the update here, including an interesting snippet from JAMA about how Merck has been trying for a while to recruit [...]

]]>