<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Physics Papers and the arXiv</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/06/17/physics-papers-and-the-arxiv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/06/17/physics-papers-and-the-arxiv/</link>
	<description>What&#039;s Hot &#38; What&#039;s Cooking in Scholarly Publishing - from the Society for Scholarly Publishing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:55:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: arXiv: un état des lieux (en 15 slides) &#171; pintiniblog</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/06/17/physics-papers-and-the-arxiv/#comment-6421</link>
		<dc:creator>arXiv: un état des lieux (en 15 slides) &#171; pintiniblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 19:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=4484#comment-6421</guid>
		<description>[...] arXiv: un état des lieux (en 15&#160;slides)    Vu sur Scholarly Kitchen: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] arXiv: un état des lieux (en 15&nbsp;slides)    Vu sur Scholarly Kitchen: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boris</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/06/17/physics-papers-and-the-arxiv/#comment-3763</link>
		<dc:creator>Boris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 23:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=4484#comment-3763</guid>
		<description>It might be just a matter of time before other fields catch up. HEP was the first field in the preprint business. 
And since HEP is well-represented in arxiv, a valid question would be if there was a high-energy physics journal that was hurt by it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It might be just a matter of time before other fields catch up. HEP was the first field in the preprint business.<br />
And since HEP is well-represented in arxiv, a valid question would be if there was a high-energy physics journal that was hurt by it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ScienceBlogs Channel : Physical Science &#124; BlogCABLE.COM</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/06/17/physics-papers-and-the-arxiv/#comment-3649</link>
		<dc:creator>ScienceBlogs Channel : Physical Science &#124; BlogCABLE.COM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 06:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=4484#comment-3649</guid>
		<description>[...] a comment by Christina Pikas, there&#8217;s a post at the Scholarly Kitchen about a new study quantifying the use of the arxiv: Employing a summer intern, Ingoldsby conducted an arXiv search of nearly 5,000 journal articles [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a comment by Christina Pikas, there&#8217;s a post at the Scholarly Kitchen about a new study quantifying the use of the arxiv: Employing a summer intern, Ingoldsby conducted an arXiv search of nearly 5,000 journal articles [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katie</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/06/17/physics-papers-and-the-arxiv/#comment-3629</link>
		<dc:creator>Katie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=4484#comment-3629</guid>
		<description>Excellent explanation. Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent explanation. Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/06/17/physics-papers-and-the-arxiv/#comment-3570</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 18:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=4484#comment-3570</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the pointer! While I&#039;ve observed quite a few times already that not &quot;all physics is on the arXiv&quot;, it&#039;s very interesting to see actual data. 

It seems that the statement &quot;all physics is on the arxiv&quot; says more about the splitting of physics into subfields and the narrowed view to take one&#039;s subfield for the whole of  physics than it says about open access.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the pointer! While I&#8217;ve observed quite a few times already that not &#8220;all physics is on the arXiv&#8221;, it&#8217;s very interesting to see actual data. </p>
<p>It seems that the statement &#8220;all physics is on the arxiv&#8221; says more about the splitting of physics into subfields and the narrowed view to take one&#8217;s subfield for the whole of  physics than it says about open access.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
