<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Strength of Weak Ties: Why Twitter Matters in Scholarly Communication</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/08/12/the-strength-of-weak-ties-why-twitter-matters-in-scholarly-communication/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/08/12/the-strength-of-weak-ties-why-twitter-matters-in-scholarly-communication/</link>
	<description>What&#039;s Hot &#38; What&#039;s Cooking in Scholarly Publishing - from the Society for Scholarly Publishing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:25:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: COM 208: Final review &#124; Writing • Photography • Blogs • Journalism</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/08/12/the-strength-of-weak-ties-why-twitter-matters-in-scholarly-communication/#comment-29807</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[COM 208: Final review &#124; Writing • Photography • Blogs • Journalism]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 11:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=5474#comment-29807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Strength of Weak Ties,&#8221; an influential sociology paper by Mark Granovetter. Article on how it applies to Twitter: You&#8217;re more likely to learn new information from [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Strength of Weak Ties,&#8221; an influential sociology paper by Mark Granovetter. Article on how it applies to Twitter: You&#8217;re more likely to learn new information from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Magnifying the Value of &#8220;Weak Ties&#8221; &#187; Cornell Info 2040 - Networks</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/08/12/the-strength-of-weak-ties-why-twitter-matters-in-scholarly-communication/#comment-8246</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#187; Magnifying the Value of &#8220;Weak Ties&#8221; &#187; Cornell Info 2040 - Networks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 08:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=5474#comment-8246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 2.) Users can share and disseminate information across &#8220;weak ties&#8221; much more quickly. Prior to social networking, one might have had to wait until an annual conference to see a professional acquaintance; now, that connection is accessible instantaneously and constantly. (E.g., Twitter is useful for disseminating ideas for scholarly research, according to this blog post.) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2.) Users can share and disseminate information across &#8220;weak ties&#8221; much more quickly. Prior to social networking, one might have had to wait until an annual conference to see a professional acquaintance; now, that connection is accessible instantaneously and constantly. (E.g., Twitter is useful for disseminating ideas for scholarly research, according to this blog post.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Twitter: A Tool for Scholarly Communication &#187; Cornell Info 2040 - Networks</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/08/12/the-strength-of-weak-ties-why-twitter-matters-in-scholarly-communication/#comment-7964</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#187; Twitter: A Tool for Scholarly Communication &#187; Cornell Info 2040 - Networks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 06:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=5474#comment-7964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/08/12/the-strength-of-weak-ties-why-twitter-matters-in-schol...   Posted in Topics: Education      These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/08/12/the-strength-of-weak-ties-why-twitter-matters-in-schol" rel="nofollow">http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/08/12/the-strength-of-weak-ties-why-twitter-matters-in-schol</a>&#8230;   Posted in Topics: Education      These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Some Memorable Dishes from the Kitchen in 2009 &#171; The Scholarly Kitchen</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/08/12/the-strength-of-weak-ties-why-twitter-matters-in-scholarly-communication/#comment-6178</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Some Memorable Dishes from the Kitchen in 2009 &#171; The Scholarly Kitchen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 10:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=5474#comment-6178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The Strength of Weak Ties: Why Twitter Matters in Scholarly Communication [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Strength of Weak Ties: Why Twitter Matters in Scholarly Communication [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Lawyers Need to Be on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter &#124; Think Law</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/08/12/the-strength-of-weak-ties-why-twitter-matters-in-scholarly-communication/#comment-5083</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Why Lawyers Need to Be on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter &#124; Think Law]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 15:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=5474#comment-5083</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] blog posts worth reading that explain how social media can expand and leverage weak ties are The Strength of Weak Ties: Why Twitter Matters in Scholarly Communication and Facebook and the Strength of Weak [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] blog posts worth reading that explain how social media can expand and leverage weak ties are The Strength of Weak Ties: Why Twitter Matters in Scholarly Communication and Facebook and the Strength of Weak [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warum Informationen schneller bei Twitter als z.B. bei Facebook fliessen&#8230; &#171; Follo Mi</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/08/12/the-strength-of-weak-ties-why-twitter-matters-in-scholarly-communication/#comment-4381</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Warum Informationen schneller bei Twitter als z.B. bei Facebook fliessen&#8230; &#171; Follo Mi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 09:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=5474#comment-4381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/08/12/the-strength-of-weak-ties-why-twitter-matters-in-schol... [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/08/12/the-strength-of-weak-ties-why-twitter-matters-in-schol" rel="nofollow">http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/08/12/the-strength-of-weak-ties-why-twitter-matters-in-schol</a>&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ann michael</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/08/12/the-strength-of-weak-ties-why-twitter-matters-in-scholarly-communication/#comment-4248</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ann michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 13:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=5474#comment-4248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;The structure of Twitter’s open, content-centric network enables information diffusion via weak ties.&quot; 

Brilliant!  I had never thought of it that way at all, but it&#039;s spot on.

One other thing about logistics.  Twitter also serves (for me) as a way to keep other statuses updated (Facebook, my blog, this blog, Plaxo, etc.) - so in a way it&#039;s a degree of consolidation for me.

Great post, Michael.  (I&#039;m so glad you&#039;re here!)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The structure of Twitter’s open, content-centric network enables information diffusion via weak ties.&#8221; </p>
<p>Brilliant!  I had never thought of it that way at all, but it&#8217;s spot on.</p>
<p>One other thing about logistics.  Twitter also serves (for me) as a way to keep other statuses updated (Facebook, my blog, this blog, Plaxo, etc.) &#8211; so in a way it&#8217;s a degree of consolidation for me.</p>
<p>Great post, Michael.  (I&#8217;m so glad you&#8217;re here!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Crotty</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/08/12/the-strength-of-weak-ties-why-twitter-matters-in-scholarly-communication/#comment-4225</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Crotty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=5474#comment-4225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/magazine/17-08/by_facebook_delete&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;recent article&lt;/a&gt; addressed this question.  Their advice?
&lt;blockquote&gt;The only way out is to police your wall, even if that&#039;s awkward. Don&#039;t be shy about deleting untoward graffiti, eliminating your name from tagged photos, or even asking friends to remove incriminating pics that weren&#039;t meant for public consumption...Then again, you could migrate to MySpace. Nobody pays attention to anything written there. &lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A <a href="http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/magazine/17-08/by_facebook_delete" rel="nofollow">recent article</a> addressed this question.  Their advice?</p>
<blockquote><p>The only way out is to police your wall, even if that&#8217;s awkward. Don&#8217;t be shy about deleting untoward graffiti, eliminating your name from tagged photos, or even asking friends to remove incriminating pics that weren&#8217;t meant for public consumption&#8230;Then again, you could migrate to MySpace. Nobody pays attention to anything written there. </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter and strength of weak ties &#171; Feral Librarian</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/08/12/the-strength-of-weak-ties-why-twitter-matters-in-scholarly-communication/#comment-4224</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Twitter and strength of weak ties &#171; Feral Librarian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=5474#comment-4224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] written before about Facebook and the strength of weak ties, and I think Michael Clarke&#8217;s The Strength of Weak Ties: Why Twitter Matters in Scholarly Communication is right on. The key part of the post is where he talks about how Twitter differs from other social [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] written before about Facebook and the strength of weak ties, and I think Michael Clarke&#8217;s The Strength of Weak Ties: Why Twitter Matters in Scholarly Communication is right on. The key part of the post is where he talks about how Twitter differs from other social [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Clarke</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/08/12/the-strength-of-weak-ties-why-twitter-matters-in-scholarly-communication/#comment-4222</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Clarke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=5474#comment-4222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, it does seem that there is a lot of cross-over from professional to personal on Twitter (and Facebook for that matter). I think both of the reasons you cite are correct. 

Indeed, Twitterquette is still emerging. Some Twitterers manage to walk the line between professional and personal very well. Tony Hsieh, Zappos CEO, is probably the best example of this. But I think some of that is due to a misperception as to how Twitter works. I think a lot of people (and I was one of them) think of Twitter as &quot;Facebook lite.&quot; 

As Twitter becomes perceived as a legitimate forum for professional communication, we&#039;ll see more of a shift to separate personal and professional accounts or to using different networks entirely for personal vs professional communication.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it does seem that there is a lot of cross-over from professional to personal on Twitter (and Facebook for that matter). I think both of the reasons you cite are correct. </p>
<p>Indeed, Twitterquette is still emerging. Some Twitterers manage to walk the line between professional and personal very well. Tony Hsieh, Zappos CEO, is probably the best example of this. But I think some of that is due to a misperception as to how Twitter works. I think a lot of people (and I was one of them) think of Twitter as &#8220;Facebook lite.&#8221; </p>
<p>As Twitter becomes perceived as a legitimate forum for professional communication, we&#8217;ll see more of a shift to separate personal and professional accounts or to using different networks entirely for personal vs professional communication.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

