<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Google Books Settlement&#8211;What Did You Choose?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/09/03/the-google-books-settlement-did-you-opt-in-or-opt-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/09/03/the-google-books-settlement-did-you-opt-in-or-opt-out/</link>
	<description>What&#039;s Hot &#38; What&#039;s Cooking in Scholarly Publishing - from the Society for Scholarly Publishing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:25:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Google Books Settlement: Where Things Stand, and Some Suggestions for What&#8217;s Next &#171; The Scholarly Kitchen</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/09/03/the-google-books-settlement-did-you-opt-in-or-opt-out/#comment-29178</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Google Books Settlement: Where Things Stand, and Some Suggestions for What&#8217;s Next &#171; The Scholarly Kitchen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 09:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=5852#comment-29178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] on his reasoning then.  And this case is far from over.  But it’s become evidently clear (as predicted) that this unfair settlement will not be approved, and Google is going to need to rethink their [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on his reasoning then.  And this case is far from over.  But it’s become evidently clear (as predicted) that this unfair settlement will not be approved, and Google is going to need to rethink their [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scholarly Communications @ Duke &#187; &#8220;Not really a settlement at all&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/09/03/the-google-books-settlement-did-you-opt-in-or-opt-out/#comment-4709</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scholarly Communications @ Duke &#187; &#8220;Not really a settlement at all&#8221;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 19:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=5852#comment-4709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] than on a clear view of how past actions will be remedied.  A recent blog post entitled &#8220;The Google Books Settlement &#8212; What Did You Choose? confirms this sense of an either/or choice to be made &#8212; either love it or hate it.  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] than on a clear view of how past actions will be remedied.  A recent blog post entitled &#8220;The Google Books Settlement &#8212; What Did You Choose? confirms this sense of an either/or choice to be made &#8212; either love it or hate it.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Crotty</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/09/03/the-google-books-settlement-did-you-opt-in-or-opt-out/#comment-4529</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Crotty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 15:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=5852#comment-4529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The French Publishers Association &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thebookseller.com/news/96204-french-publishers-association-joins-google-doubters.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;has filed a formal complaint&lt;/a&gt; against the settlement, and the Science Fiction Writers Association has opted-in, but only for t&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfwa.org/2009/08/sfwa-statement-on-proposed-google-book-settlement/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;he purpose of lodging a formal objection&lt;/a&gt; to the terms of the settlement.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The French Publishers Association <a href="http://www.thebookseller.com/news/96204-french-publishers-association-joins-google-doubters.html" rel="nofollow">has filed a formal complaint</a> against the settlement, and the Science Fiction Writers Association has opted-in, but only for t<a href="http://www.sfwa.org/2009/08/sfwa-statement-on-proposed-google-book-settlement/" rel="nofollow">he purpose of lodging a formal objection</a> to the terms of the settlement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Crotty</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/09/03/the-google-books-settlement-did-you-opt-in-or-opt-out/#comment-4513</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Crotty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 18:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=5852#comment-4513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another interesting piece came out today, separate from the controversial settlement.  Google Books&#039; system, their metadata, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.teleread.org/2009/09/02/google-book-searchs-metadata-is-a-disaster/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;is being described as&lt;/a&gt; &quot;a train wreck: a mishmash wrapped in a muddle wrapped in a mess. …&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another interesting piece came out today, separate from the controversial settlement.  Google Books&#8217; system, their metadata, <a href="http://www.teleread.org/2009/09/02/google-book-searchs-metadata-is-a-disaster/" rel="nofollow">is being described as</a> &#8220;a train wreck: a mishmash wrapped in a muddle wrapped in a mess. …&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Crotty</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/09/03/the-google-books-settlement-did-you-opt-in-or-opt-out/#comment-4512</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Crotty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 18:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=5852#comment-4512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve seen &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/08/22/nsfw-say-what-you-like-about-the-google-books-kool-aid-but-it-tastes-much-better-than-microsofts-sour-grapes/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;articles that dismiss Amazon&lt;/a&gt; (and Microsoft&#039;s) complaints just because they&#039;re competitors for Google.  But I think that&#039;s misguided, we want competition in this field and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thebookseller.com/news/95789-amazon-files-google-objection-with-us-court.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;as Amazon points out&lt;/a&gt;, this settlement prevents that:
&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;It also creates a cartel of authors and publishers—the Books Rights Registry—operating with virtually no restrictions on its actions, with the potential to raise book prices and reduce output to the detriment of consumers and new authors or publishers who would compete with the cartel members. Indeed, the agreement is even arguably unlawful on its face because it constitutes price fixing by horizontal competitors—namely, the Rightsholders, who are agreeing collectively on a mechanism for setting the highest possible prices to be charged for their works.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
The &lt;a href=&quot;http://authorsguild.org/advocacy/articles/amazon-accuses-someone-else-of-monopolizing.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Author&#039;s Guild has responded&lt;/a&gt;, calling Amazon &quot;hypocrites&quot; and citing their attempts to use the Kindle file format and DRM to create a monopoly in the e-books market.  The big difference, however, is that Amazon is making a business play (albeit a distasteful one) on their own, and they&#039;re not being granted their monopoly by the courts.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/08/22/nsfw-say-what-you-like-about-the-google-books-kool-aid-but-it-tastes-much-better-than-microsofts-sour-grapes/" rel="nofollow">articles that dismiss Amazon</a> (and Microsoft&#8217;s) complaints just because they&#8217;re competitors for Google.  But I think that&#8217;s misguided, we want competition in this field and <a href="http://www.thebookseller.com/news/95789-amazon-files-google-objection-with-us-court.html" rel="nofollow">as Amazon points out</a>, this settlement prevents that:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;It also creates a cartel of authors and publishers—the Books Rights Registry—operating with virtually no restrictions on its actions, with the potential to raise book prices and reduce output to the detriment of consumers and new authors or publishers who would compete with the cartel members. Indeed, the agreement is even arguably unlawful on its face because it constitutes price fixing by horizontal competitors—namely, the Rightsholders, who are agreeing collectively on a mechanism for setting the highest possible prices to be charged for their works.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>The <a href="http://authorsguild.org/advocacy/articles/amazon-accuses-someone-else-of-monopolizing.html" rel="nofollow">Author&#8217;s Guild has responded</a>, calling Amazon &#8220;hypocrites&#8221; and citing their attempts to use the Kindle file format and DRM to create a monopoly in the e-books market.  The big difference, however, is that Amazon is making a business play (albeit a distasteful one) on their own, and they&#8217;re not being granted their monopoly by the courts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent Anderson</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/09/03/the-google-books-settlement-did-you-opt-in-or-opt-out/#comment-4511</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kent Anderson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 17:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=5852#comment-4511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As you predicted, this ain&#039;t over with, and the courts will get involved:

http://news.cnet.com/8301-30684_3-10335976-265.html

Amazon is coming out swinging.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you predicted, this ain&#8217;t over with, and the courts will get involved:</p>
<p><a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-30684_3-10335976-265.html" rel="nofollow">http://news.cnet.com/8301-30684_3-10335976-265.html</a></p>
<p>Amazon is coming out swinging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

