<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Pencils, New Crayons, Old Humans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/09/30/new-pencils-new-crayons-old-humans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/09/30/new-pencils-new-crayons-old-humans/</link>
	<description>What&#039;s Hot &#38; What&#039;s Cooking in Scholarly Publishing - from the Society for Scholarly Publishing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 05:01:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Radical Patron &#8211; extreme thoughts on public libraries &#8211;</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/09/30/new-pencils-new-crayons-old-humans/#comment-7967</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Radical Patron &#8211; extreme thoughts on public libraries &#8211;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 12:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=6238#comment-7967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] his work.  Kent shared two insightful posts this week on evolution, rejuvenation and inertia. New Pencils, New Crayons, Old Humans and Game Over, Man — Has the Disruption of Publishing Already Occurred? Both merit a close [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] his work.  Kent shared two insightful posts this week on evolution, rejuvenation and inertia. New Pencils, New Crayons, Old Humans and Game Over, Man — Has the Disruption of Publishing Already Occurred? Both merit a close [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thorn</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/09/30/new-pencils-new-crayons-old-humans/#comment-4882</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thorn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 15:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=6238#comment-4882</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What Tony Plewak said.

I know quite a few people of my generation who talk fine but are *terrible* writers. Because they think that talking and writing are two completely different things; they feel fine speaking, but are uncomfortable writing. (The two activities do have differences; but they aren&#039;t really that *different*. One picks up a pen, and thinks, &quot;Now what should I say?&quot;) &#039;Kids&#039; nowadays know this -- because much of the time, &#039;writing&#039; is *how they talk*. 

(Hm. I wonder whether they will still be able to review transcripts of their conversations at 16 when they&#039;re about to retire...)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What Tony Plewak said.</p>
<p>I know quite a few people of my generation who talk fine but are *terrible* writers. Because they think that talking and writing are two completely different things; they feel fine speaking, but are uncomfortable writing. (The two activities do have differences; but they aren&#8217;t really that *different*. One picks up a pen, and thinks, &#8220;Now what should I say?&#8221;) &#8216;Kids&#8217; nowadays know this &#8212; because much of the time, &#8216;writing&#8217; is *how they talk*. </p>
<p>(Hm. I wonder whether they will still be able to review transcripts of their conversations at 16 when they&#8217;re about to retire&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toby Plewak</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/09/30/new-pencils-new-crayons-old-humans/#comment-4873</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Toby Plewak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=6238#comment-4873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the August issue of Wired, Clive Thompson wrote about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/techbiz/people/magazine/17-09/st_thompson&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The New Literacy&lt;/a&gt;. The article challenges the idea that &quot;kids today can&#039;t write—and technology is to blame.&quot;

Turns out that when you add up all of those txt messages, blog posts, and online product reviews, kids write far more than we ever did.  They might not be great at penmanship, punctuation and spelling, but researchers found that kids are really adept at writing for different audiences - an essential part of good writing.  They are short and to the point when txting a sandwich order, detailed when posting an online tutorial, and persuasive when arguing the merits of Mac vs. PC on a discussion board.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the August issue of Wired, Clive Thompson wrote about <a href="http://www.wired.com/techbiz/people/magazine/17-09/st_thompson" rel="nofollow">The New Literacy</a>. The article challenges the idea that &#8220;kids today can&#8217;t write—and technology is to blame.&#8221;</p>
<p>Turns out that when you add up all of those txt messages, blog posts, and online product reviews, kids write far more than we ever did.  They might not be great at penmanship, punctuation and spelling, but researchers found that kids are really adept at writing for different audiences &#8211; an essential part of good writing.  They are short and to the point when txting a sandwich order, detailed when posting an online tutorial, and persuasive when arguing the merits of Mac vs. PC on a discussion board.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

