<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Social Media Guru</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/10/06/the-social-media-guru/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/10/06/the-social-media-guru/</link>
	<description>What&#039;s Hot &#38; What&#039;s Cooking in Scholarly Publishing - from the Society for Scholarly Publishing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 03:31:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Crotty</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/10/06/the-social-media-guru/#comment-5000</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Crotty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 17:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=6377#comment-5000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also, it makes us look like pirates.  Arrrrrr....

Good point on the freemium model though, I guess that&#039;s one it doesn&#039;t take into consideration--giving away a book for free doesn&#039;t help sales if the book is really awful.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, it makes us look like pirates.  Arrrrrr&#8230;.</p>
<p>Good point on the freemium model though, I guess that&#8217;s one it doesn&#8217;t take into consideration&#8211;giving away a book for free doesn&#8217;t help sales if the book is really awful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Clarke</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/10/06/the-social-media-guru/#comment-4999</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Clarke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 17:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=6377#comment-4999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Facial hair is a very important qualification in publishing and media consulting of all kinds, though it is a positively essential indicator of social media guruness. The reasons for this are complicated and still being researched. Study results are expected to be published next year in the Journal of Theoretical Research (JTR).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Facial hair is a very important qualification in publishing and media consulting of all kinds, though it is a positively essential indicator of social media guruness. The reasons for this are complicated and still being researched. Study results are expected to be published next year in the Journal of Theoretical Research (JTR).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Smith</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/10/06/the-social-media-guru/#comment-4998</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 16:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=6377#comment-4998</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think Chris&#039;s problems with his new book were 

1) The rather unfortunate accidental extraction of chunks of wikipedia... and 

2) The fact that anyone listening to the audio version in the car, whilst, say, on the way to work, would realise that the book was in fact a load of old rubbish (IMHO). 

I liked the long tail, because there is something in the argument - His point about the need for filters to enable the long tail to really work, still stands I think (tho&#039; he didn&#039;t explore anywhere that rather crucial point). Free was an entertaining 30 minute talk (I know - I saw it) stretched beyond credulity in world that had just discovered that debt wasn&#039;t so cheap as to be free.

by the way... err, does social media guruness correlate with, um, facial hair? Guys?... ;-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Chris&#8217;s problems with his new book were </p>
<p>1) The rather unfortunate accidental extraction of chunks of wikipedia&#8230; and </p>
<p>2) The fact that anyone listening to the audio version in the car, whilst, say, on the way to work, would realise that the book was in fact a load of old rubbish (IMHO). </p>
<p>I liked the long tail, because there is something in the argument &#8211; His point about the need for filters to enable the long tail to really work, still stands I think (tho&#8217; he didn&#8217;t explore anywhere that rather crucial point). Free was an entertaining 30 minute talk (I know &#8211; I saw it) stretched beyond credulity in world that had just discovered that debt wasn&#8217;t so cheap as to be free.</p>
<p>by the way&#8230; err, does social media guruness correlate with, um, facial hair? Guys?&#8230; <img src='http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd Jassin</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/10/06/the-social-media-guru/#comment-4996</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lloyd Jassin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 14:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=6377#comment-4996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very funny satire.  Three thumbs up!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very funny satire.  Three thumbs up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Freeman</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/10/06/the-social-media-guru/#comment-4995</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Freeman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 13:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=6377#comment-4995</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re the dubious value of social media consultants, here&#039;s a dissenting voice (thanks to John Sack):

http://marshallk.com/social-media-consulting-can-be-extremely-valuable]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re the dubious value of social media consultants, here&#8217;s a dissenting voice (thanks to John Sack):</p>
<p><a href="http://marshallk.com/social-media-consulting-can-be-extremely-valuable" rel="nofollow">http://marshallk.com/social-media-consulting-can-be-extremely-valuable</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norman Frankel</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/10/06/the-social-media-guru/#comment-4987</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Norman Frankel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 22:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=6377#comment-4987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This video is very funny!  Great commentary.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This video is very funny!  Great commentary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph J. Esposito</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/10/06/the-social-media-guru/#comment-4985</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph J. Esposito]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 19:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=6377#comment-4985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The video is hilarious.  Thank you for posting this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The video is hilarious.  Thank you for posting this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Clarke</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/10/06/the-social-media-guru/#comment-4982</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Clarke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=6377#comment-4982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Completely agree regarding the differences between fiction and business books. Business books are also typically not that long in the first place and yes, the first 50 pages is usually all one needs.

The only danger with giving away older books is if the new book becomes a bigger hit than the old one. In that instances, readers of the new book (who never read the old one) may go back and buy the old one. So the new book can become marketing for the author&#039;s backlist. Of course, that falls into the category of &quot;nice problems to have.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Completely agree regarding the differences between fiction and business books. Business books are also typically not that long in the first place and yes, the first 50 pages is usually all one needs.</p>
<p>The only danger with giving away older books is if the new book becomes a bigger hit than the old one. In that instances, readers of the new book (who never read the old one) may go back and buy the old one. So the new book can become marketing for the author&#8217;s backlist. Of course, that falls into the category of &#8220;nice problems to have.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Crotty</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/10/06/the-social-media-guru/#comment-4981</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Crotty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 16:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=6377#comment-4981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But there are authors (&lt;a href=&quot;http://craphound.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Cory Doctorow&lt;/a&gt; as one example) who give away the full content of their books only to see increases in sales.  I&#039;d argue there were two flaws in the application of the freemium model here:

1) the nature of the content--one argument for the freemium model is that reading on a screen does not lend itself well to long-form reading.  You give away a free version that&#039;s read on a computer screen, people start reading it, and if they like it after 50 pages, they go buy the print version to read the whole thing.  I haven&#039;t read &quot;Free&quot;, but every Web 2.0 or business model book that I have read peters out after about 50 pages.  By that point, you understand the argument being made and the rest of the book is just a bunch of anecdotes reinforcing the argument.  There&#039;s no need to read further, you can get enough from the beginnings of the free version.  Contrast this with a fiction novel, like Doctorow writes.  For a novel, you need to read the whole thing to get the full effect of the content.

2)  the freemium model is great for selling your next book, not your current book--&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.baen.com/library/defaultTitles.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Baen Books&lt;/a&gt; has pioneered the idea of a free library.  You can download free copies of an author&#039;s older books.  If they&#039;re good, they&#039;ll hopefully inspire you to buy the author&#039;s new book, which is not free.  This works great for books that are part of a series. Make book 1 in the series free as book 2 is released.  Here, as you note, Anderson gave away the actual book he was trying to sell.  Perhaps a better strategy would have been giving away his previous book to promote the new one.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But there are authors (<a href="http://craphound.com/" rel="nofollow">Cory Doctorow</a> as one example) who give away the full content of their books only to see increases in sales.  I&#8217;d argue there were two flaws in the application of the freemium model here:</p>
<p>1) the nature of the content&#8211;one argument for the freemium model is that reading on a screen does not lend itself well to long-form reading.  You give away a free version that&#8217;s read on a computer screen, people start reading it, and if they like it after 50 pages, they go buy the print version to read the whole thing.  I haven&#8217;t read &#8220;Free&#8221;, but every Web 2.0 or business model book that I have read peters out after about 50 pages.  By that point, you understand the argument being made and the rest of the book is just a bunch of anecdotes reinforcing the argument.  There&#8217;s no need to read further, you can get enough from the beginnings of the free version.  Contrast this with a fiction novel, like Doctorow writes.  For a novel, you need to read the whole thing to get the full effect of the content.</p>
<p>2)  the freemium model is great for selling your next book, not your current book&#8211;<a href="http://www.baen.com/library/defaultTitles.htm" rel="nofollow">Baen Books</a> has pioneered the idea of a free library.  You can download free copies of an author&#8217;s older books.  If they&#8217;re good, they&#8217;ll hopefully inspire you to buy the author&#8217;s new book, which is not free.  This works great for books that are part of a series. Make book 1 in the series free as book 2 is released.  Here, as you note, Anderson gave away the actual book he was trying to sell.  Perhaps a better strategy would have been giving away his previous book to promote the new one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Clarke</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/10/06/the-social-media-guru/#comment-4979</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Clarke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 15:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=6377#comment-4979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The problem with Chris Anderson&#039;s &quot;free&quot; model for &quot;Free&quot; is that he is giving away the same thing as he was asking people to pay for. OK, yes, one version was in print but it is the same content. 

I remember reading his (open access) Wired article on the Long Tail and then deciding to buy the book. It turned out to be a bad decision as there is nothing of consequence added to the book and the article is a more succinct read, but as a marketing tool the free article did indeed lead me to buy the book. 

But I&#039;m not sure how the free book would inspire me to buy the same book for free. 

Also, and on a separate note, I suppose this is not a good moment to announce my new social media consulting services?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with Chris Anderson&#8217;s &#8220;free&#8221; model for &#8220;Free&#8221; is that he is giving away the same thing as he was asking people to pay for. OK, yes, one version was in print but it is the same content. </p>
<p>I remember reading his (open access) Wired article on the Long Tail and then deciding to buy the book. It turned out to be a bad decision as there is nothing of consequence added to the book and the article is a more succinct read, but as a marketing tool the free article did indeed lead me to buy the book. </p>
<p>But I&#8217;m not sure how the free book would inspire me to buy the same book for free. </p>
<p>Also, and on a separate note, I suppose this is not a good moment to announce my new social media consulting services?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

