<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Subscription Model Lives and Thrives</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/10/13/the-subscription-model-lives-and-thrives/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/10/13/the-subscription-model-lives-and-thrives/</link>
	<description>What&#039;s Hot &#38; What&#039;s Cooking in Scholarly Publishing - from the Society for Scholarly Publishing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:25:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent Anderson</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/10/13/the-subscription-model-lives-and-thrives/#comment-5108</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kent Anderson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=6448#comment-5108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great point, David, about the DVDs. Subscriptions aren&#039;t tied to the past, to any medium, but to convenience, inertia, and sustainability. I think people like having things they like survive. Subscribers have jobs, and they know that stuff costs money. We swallowed the &quot;information wants to be free&quot; crowds&#039; fairy tale for too long. Remember, the other part of the quote is, &quot;information wants to be expensive.&quot; It was meant to show an internal conflict, and it surely captures it. We just sound-bit our way into forgetting the counterpoint.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great point, David, about the DVDs. Subscriptions aren&#8217;t tied to the past, to any medium, but to convenience, inertia, and sustainability. I think people like having things they like survive. Subscribers have jobs, and they know that stuff costs money. We swallowed the &#8220;information wants to be free&#8221; crowds&#8217; fairy tale for too long. Remember, the other part of the quote is, &#8220;information wants to be expensive.&#8221; It was meant to show an internal conflict, and it surely captures it. We just sound-bit our way into forgetting the counterpoint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent Anderson</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/10/13/the-subscription-model-lives-and-thrives/#comment-5107</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kent Anderson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 14:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=6448#comment-5107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great examples. Contact lenses are another, as are tax software packages, which are more or less marketed as self-renewing subscriptions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great examples. Contact lenses are another, as are tax software packages, which are more or less marketed as self-renewing subscriptions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Crotty</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/10/13/the-subscription-model-lives-and-thrives/#comment-5106</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Crotty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 14:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=6448#comment-5106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Funny you used Netflix for the image here, as their CEO just declared&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pcworld.com/article/173460/are_dvds_nearing_the_end.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; the death of DVDs in the next two years&lt;/a&gt;, although they&#039;re hoping to have other subscription mechanisms in place by then.

This is an insightful post though--subscription is a superb business model at the moment.  It&#039;s a business model that people understand and are willing to participate in for many products.  We&#039;ve taken this approach with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cshprotocols.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Cold Spring Harbor Protocols&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, as an attempt to translate our print laboratory manual publishing program (which dates back to 1972) into the modern online world.  The print manuals continue to sell well, but we&#039;ve found that younger scientists are less and less aware of their existence, preferring instead to look online for instructions on laboratory methods.  Moving our print material into an online journal/database (along with newly submitted and commissioned methods) makes it findable and accessible for a wider audience and provides a sustainable revenue stream for the program should print sales ever tail off.  It&#039;s not as flashy or groundbreaking a concept as many new ventures, but it is proving to be a success, both financially and in acceptance by the community.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny you used Netflix for the image here, as their CEO just declared<a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/173460/are_dvds_nearing_the_end.html" rel="nofollow"> the death of DVDs in the next two years</a>, although they&#8217;re hoping to have other subscription mechanisms in place by then.</p>
<p>This is an insightful post though&#8211;subscription is a superb business model at the moment.  It&#8217;s a business model that people understand and are willing to participate in for many products.  We&#8217;ve taken this approach with <a href="http://www.cshprotocols.org" rel="nofollow"><em>Cold Spring Harbor Protocols</em></a>, as an attempt to translate our print laboratory manual publishing program (which dates back to 1972) into the modern online world.  The print manuals continue to sell well, but we&#8217;ve found that younger scientists are less and less aware of their existence, preferring instead to look online for instructions on laboratory methods.  Moving our print material into an online journal/database (along with newly submitted and commissioned methods) makes it findable and accessible for a wider audience and provides a sustainable revenue stream for the program should print sales ever tail off.  It&#8217;s not as flashy or groundbreaking a concept as many new ventures, but it is proving to be a success, both financially and in acceptance by the community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Sack</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/10/13/the-subscription-model-lives-and-thrives/#comment-5105</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Sack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 14:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=6448#comment-5105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Subscriptions show up in lots of places.  Not just performance series subscriptions, er, seasons.  I bought a new electric razor and electric toothbrush recently on Amazon, and Amazon offered me &quot;timed refills&quot; (aka a subscription) for cleaning supplies and new brushes.  I also bought a new trash can online (not from Amazon, from SimpleHuman&#039;s web site) and didn&#039;t get offered a &#039;subscription&#039; for can liners.  

In all these cases, I think a subscription is a convenience, an  alternative to remembering to get more &quot;just in time&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Subscriptions show up in lots of places.  Not just performance series subscriptions, er, seasons.  I bought a new electric razor and electric toothbrush recently on Amazon, and Amazon offered me &#8220;timed refills&#8221; (aka a subscription) for cleaning supplies and new brushes.  I also bought a new trash can online (not from Amazon, from SimpleHuman&#8217;s web site) and didn&#8217;t get offered a &#8216;subscription&#8217; for can liners.  </p>
<p>In all these cases, I think a subscription is a convenience, an  alternative to remembering to get more &#8220;just in time&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

