<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lifelines and Funeral Rites in the Publishing World</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2010/01/18/lifelines-and-death-sentences-in-the-publishing-world/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2010/01/18/lifelines-and-death-sentences-in-the-publishing-world/</link>
	<description>What&#039;s Hot &#38; What&#039;s Cooking in Scholarly Publishing - from the Society for Scholarly Publishing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:25:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Clarke</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2010/01/18/lifelines-and-death-sentences-in-the-publishing-world/#comment-6648</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Clarke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 17:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=7747#comment-6648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had always wanted to attend the Stanford course and was never able to for similar reasons to those you cite.

I think there may be one other reason for the program&#039;s discontinuation to add to your list: the expansion of publishing programs at Columbia and George Washington University (as well as University College of London). Both universities now offer a wide number of courses through the year. Both the Columbia and GW programs also allow students to earn credit towards a degree—something that was not offered at Stanford. 

I still think there was a place for Stanford&#039;s course, though only if they reoriented it towards new media. The Publishing on the Web course that you mention might have become the centerpiece of a new program focused on the very disruptions that resulted in the demise of the original program.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had always wanted to attend the Stanford course and was never able to for similar reasons to those you cite.</p>
<p>I think there may be one other reason for the program&#8217;s discontinuation to add to your list: the expansion of publishing programs at Columbia and George Washington University (as well as University College of London). Both universities now offer a wide number of courses through the year. Both the Columbia and GW programs also allow students to earn credit towards a degree—something that was not offered at Stanford. </p>
<p>I still think there was a place for Stanford&#8217;s course, though only if they reoriented it towards new media. The Publishing on the Web course that you mention might have become the centerpiece of a new program focused on the very disruptions that resulted in the demise of the original program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

