The Digitized Book Corpus and the Cracking Dam
A new report from OCLC underscores how much water is already over, and how fragile the foundation has become.
A new report from OCLC underscores how much water is already over, and how fragile the foundation has become.
We’re now entering our fourth year of publication. Look how we’ve grown!
A talk by Margaret Atwood which reminds us that authors are not to be overlooked as we charge ahead with changes in publishing — and that change itself requires thoughtful choices.
Does cascading peer-review increase inappropriate submissions?
Customers have accepted the analogy that they “buy” e-books, but publishers may be faced with accepting the fact that they’re selling licenses. What this could mean to their bottom lines may not be the most painful part of this shift.
The tablet wars are on, with special significance for STM publishers.
Apple’s apparent abuse of its platform dominance may signal a basic incompatibility between providers and platforms.
Complexity, culture, and baked-in bias are limiting how publishers define value and approach the future.
With more and more science being tested and communicated outside traditional outlets, we may face a moment when faith in the existing system breaks down.
Scottie Pippen was a Beatle? Scholars a thousand years from now might just find evidence to suggest as much.
For scholars to excel in the information age, technology needs to learn to learn. Perhaps highly specialized humans can help.
The outer ring of citation remains a point of vulnerability for quality proxies, as does reducing complex things to simple lists or numbers. When will we learn?
Should publishers endorse commercial editing services?
Business models for publishers fall into four broad categories, defined by how revenue is generated. Some classes of content lend themselves to one model over another.
Authors use movies and songs to inspire the titles of their papers, often to unintentionally silly effect.