<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Scholarly Kitchen &#187; Phil Davis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/author/pmd8/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org</link>
	<description>What&#039;s Hot &#38; What&#039;s Cooking in Scholarly Publishing - from the Society for Scholarly Publishing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 06:06:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/osd.xml" title="The Scholarly Kitchen" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>When Journal Editors Coerce Authors to Self-Cite</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2012/02/02/when-journal-editors-coerce-authors-to-self-cite/</link>
		<comments>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2012/02/02/when-journal-editors-coerce-authors-to-self-cite/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 19:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phil Davis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Controversial Topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metrics and Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peer Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sociology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academic publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business journals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self-citation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=24001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Editors of business journals strategically coerce authors to increase citation rates, a new study in Science reports. <a href="http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2012/02/02/when-journal-editors-coerce-authors-to-self-cite/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org&amp;blog=2979803&amp;post=24001&amp;subd=scholarlykitchen&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2012/02/02/when-journal-editors-coerce-authors-to-self-cite/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/5b59c726d6957c2a6b8ae033ab10fc7c?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Phil</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/0/0d/Mafia_II_Boxart.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Mafia II</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=87828412-6b69-4965-926f-6eddea19edfa" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Size and Discipline Bias in F1000 Journal Rankings</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2012/01/27/size-and-discipline-bias-in-f1000-journal-rankings/</link>
		<comments>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2012/01/27/size-and-discipline-bias-in-f1000-journal-rankings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phil Davis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Experimentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metrics and Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biomedicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eigenfactor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F1000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F1000 Journal Factor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Impact factor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journal rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Post-publication review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific Impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCImago Journal Rank]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=23723</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The rankings of journals based on F1000 scores reveals a strong bias against larger journals and those with little disciplinary overlap with the biosciences. <a href="http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2012/01/27/size-and-discipline-bias-in-f1000-journal-rankings/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org&amp;blog=2979803&amp;post=23723&amp;subd=scholarlykitchen&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2012/01/27/size-and-discipline-bias-in-f1000-journal-rankings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/5b59c726d6957c2a6b8ae033ab10fc7c?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Phil</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://farm8.static.flickr.com/7034/6735929719_d6f13e0c3e_m.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Peer Review</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://scholarlykitchen.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/f1000bubbleplot.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Evaluated articles versus F1000 Journal Factor. The size of each journal is represented by the number of eligible articles</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=44fc1301-ae78-4f28-b6a6-4d42e8595e6e" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tweets, and Our Obsession with Alt Metrics</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2012/01/04/tweets-and-our-obsession-with-alt-metrics/</link>
		<comments>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2012/01/04/tweets-and-our-obsession-with-alt-metrics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 09:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phil Davis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Controversial Topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metrics and Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peer Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Scholar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gunther Eysenbach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journal Citation Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journal of Medical Internet Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scopus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=23445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can tweets predict future citations? A study of article tweets raises validity and ethical concerns. <a href="http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2012/01/04/tweets-and-our-obsession-with-alt-metrics/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org&amp;blog=2979803&amp;post=23445&amp;subd=scholarlykitchen&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2012/01/04/tweets-and-our-obsession-with-alt-metrics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/5b59c726d6957c2a6b8ae033ab10fc7c?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Phil</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/74/Twitschervogel01_derived_from_twitter-t.svg/300px-Twitschervogel01_derived_from_twitter-t.svg.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">English: Tweeting bird, derived from the initi...</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=67072f9e-828b-4e3b-82fe-c588c27c80a0" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quality Reviewing Declines with Experience</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2011/12/19/quality-reviewing-declines-with-experience/</link>
		<comments>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2011/12/19/quality-reviewing-declines-with-experience/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 09:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phil Davis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peer Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Annals of Emergency Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=23168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A longitudinal study shows most reviewers submit poorer quality reviews over time. Cognitive decline and competing responsibilities may help to explain why experience may be a liability in peer-review. <a href="http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2011/12/19/quality-reviewing-declines-with-experience/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org&amp;blog=2979803&amp;post=23168&amp;subd=scholarlykitchen&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2011/12/19/quality-reviewing-declines-with-experience/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/5b59c726d6957c2a6b8ae033ab10fc7c?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Phil</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/5/56/That_Certain_Age.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">That Certain Age</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://img.zemanta.com/zemified_e.png?x-id=0e962b40-dc7e-47e6-abbd-2f64f1f0f26a" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Enhanced by Zemanta</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>eLife: Can a Top-Tier Journal Run Without Professional Help?</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2011/12/01/elife-can-a-top-tier-journal-run-without-professional-help/</link>
		<comments>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2011/12/01/elife-can-a-top-tier-journal-run-without-professional-help/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 09:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phil Davis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Controversial Topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peer Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eLife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard Hughes Medical Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Max Planck Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open access journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Randy Schekman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wellcome Trust]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=22831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can a new open access journal that relies on working scientists to oversee its review process compete with other top-tier journals that employ professional editors? <a href="http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2011/12/01/elife-can-a-top-tier-journal-run-without-professional-help/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org&amp;blog=2979803&amp;post=22831&amp;subd=scholarlykitchen&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2011/12/01/elife-can-a-top-tier-journal-run-without-professional-help/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/5b59c726d6957c2a6b8ae033ab10fc7c?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Phil</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f6/Servants_quarters%2C_Dalmore_House%2C_Stair.JPG/300px-Servants_quarters%2C_Dalmore_House%2C_Stair.JPG" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Servants quarters</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=50394c71-3c49-448f-bff5-9a0b53452cbf" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Statistics and Storytelling &#8212; Why We Need Them Both in Science</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2011/11/15/statistics-and-storytelling-why-we-need-them-both-in-science/</link>
		<comments>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2011/11/15/statistics-and-storytelling-why-we-need-them-both-in-science/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 09:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phil Davis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Controversial Topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence-based medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan A. Eisen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meta-analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[narratives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=22554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two thought-provoking articles published last week in JAMA make compelling and complementary arguments to the rhetorical power of both numbers and words in conveying the message of science. <a href="http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2011/11/15/statistics-and-storytelling-why-we-need-them-both-in-science/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org&amp;blog=2979803&amp;post=22554&amp;subd=scholarlykitchen&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2011/11/15/statistics-and-storytelling-why-we-need-them-both-in-science/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/5b59c726d6957c2a6b8ae033ab10fc7c?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Phil</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3078/2566241384_4264b1f0f3_m.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">John Steinbeck on Story telling...</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=94a07d1f-1348-4bbe-bd11-41e63a6a3497" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cheat Sites: Where Students Turn to Crib Papers</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2011/11/04/cheat-sites-where-students-turn-to-crib-papers/</link>
		<comments>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2011/11/04/cheat-sites-where-students-turn-to-crib-papers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 09:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phil Davis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Controversial Topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iThenticate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plagiarism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[students]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turnitin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=22462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A study of matched content in student papers submitted to Turnitin reveals where students turn for sources but is unable to distinguish instances of plagiarism from valid scholarly use. <a href="http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2011/11/04/cheat-sites-where-students-turn-to-crib-papers/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org&amp;blog=2979803&amp;post=22462&amp;subd=scholarlykitchen&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2011/11/04/cheat-sites-where-students-turn-to-crib-papers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/5b59c726d6957c2a6b8ae033ab10fc7c?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Phil</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/d/dc/Turnitin_logo.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Turnitin</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=29938462-bc61-4479-9523-dfe2c95e4e40" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vanishing Ghost Authorship</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2011/10/31/vanishing-ghost-authorship/</link>
		<comments>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2011/10/31/vanishing-ghost-authorship/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 09:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phil Davis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Controversial Topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Medical Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Medical Writers Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[authorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BMJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Medical Writers Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical ghostwriter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical journals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=22373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The prevalence of ghost authorship in the medical literature may be in decline, a new study reports. Is the issue really social or is authorship partly a problem of definition? <a href="http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2011/10/31/vanishing-ghost-authorship/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org&amp;blog=2979803&amp;post=22373&amp;subd=scholarlykitchen&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2011/10/31/vanishing-ghost-authorship/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/5b59c726d6957c2a6b8ae033ab10fc7c?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Phil</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/30/49747530_6a1d4dde91_m.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Ghost guardians</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=a1561410-c869-4004-8fee-2ac84591779e" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should Journals Sell Reprints?</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2011/10/21/should-journals-sell-reprints/</link>
		<comments>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2011/10/21/should-journals-sell-reprints/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phil Davis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Controversial Topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BMJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editorial bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial disclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journal publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical journals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=22291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Article reprints can be a considerable source of income for some medical journals and there is some worry that this source of income presents a conflict of interest for publishers. <a href="http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2011/10/21/should-journals-sell-reprints/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org&amp;blog=2979803&amp;post=22291&amp;subd=scholarlykitchen&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2011/10/21/should-journals-sell-reprints/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/5b59c726d6957c2a6b8ae033ab10fc7c?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Phil</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2518/4231652637_ff8c9a2d8c_m.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Janus</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://img.zemanta.com/zemified_e.png?x-id=4033f0fd-cfb1-4cc6-97ee-b0d817c2ebc1" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Enhanced by Zemanta</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gaming the Impact Factor Puts Journal In Time-out</title>
		<link>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2011/10/17/gaming-the-impact-factor-puts-journal-in-time-out/</link>
		<comments>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2011/10/17/gaming-the-impact-factor-puts-journal-in-time-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 09:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phil Davis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Controversial Topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metrics and Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Impact factor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journal Citation Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science indicators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific misconduct]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=22072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Attempts to game a journal's Impact Factor can result in being de-listed from the Journal Citation Report. Most offenders learn their lesson and return to normal citation behavior. <a href="http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2011/10/17/gaming-the-impact-factor-puts-journal-in-time-out/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org&amp;blog=2979803&amp;post=22072&amp;subd=scholarlykitchen&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2011/10/17/gaming-the-impact-factor-puts-journal-in-time-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/5b59c726d6957c2a6b8ae033ab10fc7c?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Phil</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://scholarlykitchen.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/time-out.jpg?w=200" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Time out, in the corner</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://img.zemanta.com/zemified_e.png?x-id=9944fc21-af8b-4d2c-920b-6ee950aa6d2f" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Enhanced by Zemanta</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
