Strange comments emerge after a post about Beall’s list of “predatory” publishers appears, many of which attribute sentiments to people falsely. Continue reading
Authors should not be surprised when their open access articles show up in surprising places. Is it possible to embrace open access with some restrictions? Continue reading
We’re officially in the age of online petitions, which may be taking the place of actual activism. Is that an improvement? Continue reading
A new declaration to improve research assessment practices shoots wide of the mark and reveals some misunderstandings on behalf of many of those involved. Continue reading
Incomplete signals in the scholarly publishing marketplace create problems for every participant. What is the path forward? Continue reading
More internal PubMed Central emails show quite clearly that PMC is wasting taxpayers’ money solving problems publishers have already solved. Continue reading
Social networking and crowdsourcing have attributes that may make them both incompatible with the goals and process of science. Can we accept that? Continue reading
Eighteen years ago, Mosaic ushered in the potential for a sea-change in publishing based on technological prowess and scale. Today, the “open” label covers a set of disparate incentives under a single blanket, one that funders, government, and technology companies are all under, each for its own reason. Continue reading
The OSTP access memorandum has led to hearings this month. Be sure to contribute and observe. Continue reading
While the access debates have dominated, another debate has been emerging, one that perhaps has greater significance in the long run. Continue reading