Do higher impact journals do a better job with their statistics? A study with a sexy title proves to be poorly designed and poorly reported. Continue reading
When your blog lets you know it’s impressed with your production level, you know you’ve done something that’s both impressive and regrettable. Continue reading
A new financial analysis of open access and two major publishers suggests that many of the trends we’re seeing aren’t about adversarial ideas and win:lose propositions, but about relatively small market adjustments and incremental changes. Continue reading
While many technologists continue to demand a publishing revolution, the precepts of such a revolution are already incorporated into the strategic thinking of most publishing companies. To further the adoption of more digital practices, what is needed are practical solutions that are expressed in dollars and cents. Continue reading
An electric car’s data versus a journalist’s experiences — and neither proves sufficient for the task of telling us exactly what happened. Continue reading
The Scholarly Kitchen turns five this month. How time flies when you’re having fun. Continue reading
Initiatives like Rubriq will succeed if they address the real needs of authors, reviewers, and editors. Take the survey and tell us what you think. Continue reading
Consumer media sets expectations for how professional media will develop. The new production of “House of Cards” is an example of this. Continue reading
Editors have learned how to exploit a simple loophole in the calculation of the Impact Factor. Is it time to close that loophole? Continue reading
Free services and open access are distorting the publishing world. Will the big only get bigger? Continue reading