F1000

This tag is associated with 7 posts

Seeking Acceptance at F1000 Research — Early Problems With Identity and Outsourced Authority

Articles are published before they’re reviewed; doubts about a paper are viewed as a positive status; papers only need to contain “science;” review and revision can continue forever; and PubMed Central is their certifying entity. Welcome to the world of F1000 Research. Continue reading »

How Rigorous Is the Post-publication Review Process at F1000 Research?

Comparing the length of post-publication peer reviews in F1000 Research to those done pre-publication in four major medical journals shows authors are less likely to receive constructive or substantial criticism with F1000 Research reviews, despite a highly academic reviewer pool. Continue reading »

Can F1000 Recommendations Predict Future Citations?

Expert ratings have poorer predictive power than journal citation metrics, study reveals. Continue reading »

An Interview With Keith Collier, Co-Founder of Rubriq

With the creation of Rubriq, co-founders Shashi Mudunuri and Keith Collier have broken new ground. Rubriq is an attempt to provide peer-review independent from journals. Continue reading »

Size and Discipline Bias in F1000 Journal Rankings

The rankings of journals based on F1000 scores reveals a strong bias against larger journals and those with little disciplinary overlap with the biosciences. Continue reading »

F1000 Journal Rankings — The Map Is Not the Territory

Does the release of a journal ranking metric signal a change in vision for post-publication peer review? Continue reading »

Post-Publication Review: Does It Add Anything New and Useful?

Post-publication review is spotty, unreliable, and may suffer from cronyism, several studies reveal. Continue reading »

Side Dishes by Stewart Wills

Find Posts by Category

Find Posts by Date

June 2013
S M T W T F S
« May    
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  

The Scholarly Kitchen on Twitter

SSP_LOGO
The mission of the Society for Scholarly Publishing (SSP) is "[t]o advance scholarly publishing and communication, and the professional development of its members through education, collaboration, and networking." SSP established The Scholarly Kitchen blog in February 2008 to keep SSP members and interested parties aware of new developments in publishing.
......................................
The Scholarly Kitchen is a moderated and independent blog. Opinions on The Scholarly Kitchen are those of the authors. They are not necessarily those held by the Society for Scholarly Publishing nor by their respective employers.
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 6,990 other followers