Books and book chapters have a competitive disadvantage in citations, but it’s not accessibility that makes the difference — there are more reasons, and more changes needed. Continue reading
Article reprints can be a considerable source of income for some medical journals and there is some worry that this source of income presents a conflict of interest for publishers. Continue reading
Humor about scientific misconduct may reflect a deeper, more serious side of academic culture gone wrong. Continue reading
Does cascading peer-review increase inappropriate submissions? Continue reading
Should publishers endorse commercial editing services? Continue reading
When Nature goes head-to-head with PLoS, will non-profit society publishers take the hit? Continue reading
If submission fees result in a more sustainable business model, why are open access publishers opposed to the idea? Continue reading
EMBO opens up the black box of peer-review. Is it worth the cost? Continue reading
Supplemental data undermine scientific integrity by undermining the peer review process. Continue reading
National Academy of Sciences members contribute the very best (and very worst) articles in PNAS, a recent analysis suggests. Is diversity a better indicator of success than consistency in science publishing? Continue reading