A group of history editors in the UK publish an open letter stating they will not comply with aspects of the RCUK mandates for OA. What can we learn from this?
More value can be delivered online, and members seem to be seeking it. Is it time to move to an online-only benefits model for societies?
Open access publishing is a viable option, with gold OA gaining traction. But concerns remain, and funding is uncertain.
In addition to what publishers do directly for authors and readers, they foster many collaborative and philanthropic efforts around the world.
When there’s a lot at stake, peer review still helps to separate the best information from the rest.
Learned societies are likely to be significantly affected by OA mandates, yet many remain silent, and may be ill-informed. What is their path forward?