China and Open Access
An interview with Mark Robertson about the CAST/STM report on open access and China.
Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe is Professor as well as Coordinator for Research and Teaching Professional Development in the University Library at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. She is also an affiliate faculty member in the University’s School of Information Sciences and Center for Global Studies. Her responsibilities encompass training, coaching, and mentoring library employees to achieve success in their scholarship and educational roles. Lisa has taught courses in the iSchool on user education, international information organizations and policy making, library service evaluation and assessment, and academic librarianship. Lisa is the secretary of the IFLA Education and Training Section and a member of the ORCID Board of Directors. She is the PI on the Prioritizing Privacy (IMLS) and Licensing Privacy (Mellon) projects as well as co-PI for CARLI Counts (IMLS). Lisa has consulted, presented, and published widely on the scholarly communications, publishing, the value of libraries, strategic planning, organizational innovation, emerging technologies, program evaluation, library assessment, inclusion and equity, information literacy, and teaching and learning. Her clients include libraries, colleges and universities, scholarly and professional associations, and non-profit organizations and for-profit companies in the library business community. For more information – website: lisahinchliffe.com, Twitter: @lisalibrarian, and ORCID: 0000-0002-5129-4235.
An interview with Mark Robertson about the CAST/STM report on open access and China.
The brave new world post-Twitter, or post-the Old Twitter, or has anything really changed? Chefs ponder the new social media.
An interview by @lisalibrarian with Simon Linacre, author of “The Predator Effect”
Though open access indicators within a given publishing platform are relatively consistent, significant inconsistency across platforms likely creates user confusion.
What if even by saying “fake science” you inadvertently participate in a scam? What if this phrase legitimizes fraud, lies, and deceit? Let’s call it what it is – dupery.
SSP is recruiting for the next North American Editor for Learned Publishing. Consider applying or encouraging others to do so!
Day 2 of Chef reactions to the OSTP Policy memo. What are your thoughts? Share your views with the Scholarly Kitchen community.
Interview with Joris van Rossum and Hylke Koers about the new STM Integrity Hub service launch and its potential future developments.
Today we ask the Scholarly Kitchen Chefs how they’re feeling about in-person conferences in general, and the 2022 SSP Annual Meeting in particular.
In a novel license agreement, Elsevier agrees to open backfile content from a consortium of elite private institutions. Will other libraries and publishers follow this model?