Phil Davis, Author at The Scholarly Kitchen

Phil Davis is a publishing consultant specializing in the statistical analysis of citation, readership, publication and survey data. He has a Ph.D. in science communication from Cornell University (2010), extensive experience as a science librarian (1995-2006) and was trained as a life scientist. https://phil-davis.com/

Articles by Phil Davis

Unpacking The Altmetric Black Box

Article Attention Scores for papers don’t seem to add up, leading one to question whether Altmetric data are valid, reliable, and reproducible.

Journal Citation Indicator. Just Another Tool in Clarivate’s Metrics Toolbox?

Can Clarivate deliver on a single, normalized measurement of citation impact or did its marketing department promise too much?

Sci-Hub Citation Study Confuses Causes With Effects

Do Sci-Hub downloads cause more citations, or are high impact papers simply downloaded more often?

Changing Journal Impact Factor Rules Creates Unfair Playing Field For Some

Some journals are expected to benefit immensely under Clarivate’s new counting model.

Changes to Journal Impact Factor Announced for 2021

Starting 2021, Journal Impact Factors will be calcuated using online publication dates, not print ones. But phased roll-out may lead to bias for some journals.

Tweeting-Citations Authors Speak, Finally

We stand by our data. We just won’t share it or believe that you replicated our study.

Reanalysis of Tweeting Study Yields No Citation Benefit

Scientific authorship comes with benefits, but also responsibilities. If authors are unwilling to explain their work, editors must step up to defend their journal.

Intention to Tweet: Medical Study Reports Tweets Improve Citations

A paper linking tweets and citations comes under attack, but more from the authors’ inability to answer even basic questions about their paper and resistance to share their data.

Data Analysis: How Effective Is TrendMD?

A reanalysis of TrendMD experimental data reveal details on its effectiveness, novelty, and bias.

Study: Recommender Systems May Increase Citations

TrendMD may drive traffic, saves, and citations, according to a new study by the founders and employees of TrendMD. Deeper analysis of their results reveal overstated results and a lack of context. Should these papers be considered sound science just another form of marketing?

Official Blog of:

The Chefs

Most Recent

Recent Tweets

Retweet on Twitter Scholarly Kitchen Retweeted

Joseph Esposito @JosephJEsposito·

The Other Diversity in Scholarly Publishing https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2022/01/24/the-other-diversity-in-scholarly-publishing/ via @scholarlykitchn

Retweet on Twitter Scholarly Kitchen Retweeted

Rick Anderson @Looptopper·

18h

The Other Diversity in Scholarly Publishing https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2022/01/24/the-other-diversity-in-scholarly-publishing/ by @hmirfanullah via @scholarlykitchn. (Now the big question: will we embrace and celebrate this diversity, or try to eliminate it in favor of a scholcomm monoculture?)

Retweet on Twitter Scholarly Kitchen Retweeted

Joseph Esposito @JosephJEsposito·

17h

The Terrible Price of Free: On E-reading Jane Austen via Google's Ebooks https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2011/03/14/the-terrible-price-of-free-on-e-reading-jane-austen-via-googles-ebooks/ via @scholarlykitchn

Follow the Scholarly Kitchen Blog Follow Us