Phil Davis, Author at The Scholarly Kitchen

Phil Davis is a publishing consultant specializing in the statistical analysis of citation, readership, publication and survey data. He has a Ph.D. in science communication from Cornell University (2010), extensive experience as a science librarian (1995-2006) and was trained as a life scientist. https://phil-davis.org/

Articles by Phil Davis

Journal Citation Indicator. Just Another Tool in Clarivate’s Metrics Toolbox?

Can Clarivate deliver on a single, normalized measurement of citation impact or did its marketing department promise too much?

Sci-Hub Citation Study Confuses Causes With Effects

Do Sci-Hub downloads cause more citations, or are high impact papers simply downloaded more often?

Changing Journal Impact Factor Rules Creates Unfair Playing Field For Some

Some journals are expected to benefit immensely under Clarivate’s new counting model.

Changes to Journal Impact Factor Announced for 2021

Starting 2021, Journal Impact Factors will be calcuated using online publication dates, not print ones. But phased roll-out may lead to bias for some journals.

Tweeting-Citations Authors Speak, Finally

We stand by our data. We just won’t share it or believe that you replicated our study.

Reanalysis of Tweeting Study Yields No Citation Benefit

Scientific authorship comes with benefits, but also responsibilities. If authors are unwilling to explain their work, editors must step up to defend their journal.

Intention to Tweet: Medical Study Reports Tweets Improve Citations

A paper linking tweets and citations comes under attack, but more from the authors’ inability to answer even basic questions about their paper and resistance to share their data.

Data Analysis: How Effective Is TrendMD?

A reanalysis of TrendMD experimental data reveal details on its effectiveness, novelty, and bias.

Study: Recommender Systems May Increase Citations

TrendMD may drive traffic, saves, and citations, according to a new study by the founders and employees of TrendMD. Deeper analysis of their results reveal overstated results and a lack of context. Should these papers be considered sound science just another form of marketing?

Is PLOS Running Out Of Time? Financial Statements Suggest Urgency To Innovate

The publisher is committed to financial sustainability. How it achieves it is an open question.

Official Blog of:

The Chefs

Most Recent

Recent Tweets

Retweet on Twitter Scholarly Kitchen Retweeted

Ulrich Herb @scinoptica·

19h

Mapping #OpenScience Tools https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2018/08/30/mapping-open-science-tools/ via @scholarlykitchn

Retweet on Twitter Scholarly Kitchen Retweeted

loganthomison @loganthomison·

20h

Making the Case for a PID-Optimized World https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2021/06/22/making-the-case-for-a-pid-optimized-world/ via @scholarlykitchn

Retweet on Twitter Scholarly Kitchen Retweeted

Alice Meadows @alicejmeadows·

19h

I'm a bit proud of the work @phillbjones & I share in our 2nd @scholarlykitchn post on PIDs - MoreBrains cost benefit analysis w/ @Jisc showing UK could save est £5.67M if @CrossrefOrg @datacite @ORCID_Org @RAiD_PID @ResearchOrgs IDs are widely adopted https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2021/06/22/making-the-case-for-a-pid-optimized-world/

Follow the Scholarly Kitchen Blog Follow Us