They Might Be Giants, and the Self-Correcting Nature of Science
They Might Be Giants offer a musical retraction notice.
They Might Be Giants offer a musical retraction notice.
Despite a growing anti-Impact Factor movement, a quick look at readership and search query data shows a continued growth of interest in knowing journals’ Impact Factors, even for the journal where it may be the least relevant.
A rare glimpse at a long-running experiment.
As a former child and as a current parent, I feel I owe a great debt to Fred Rogers. Here’s a rare treat, a documentary about Mister Rogers from 1967, just before the national launch of Mister Rogers’ Neighborhood in […]
To launch their summer reading project, the Seattle Public Library went for a world’s record.
An interview with MIke Rossner, former Director of Rockefeller University Press.
Enjoy a musical interlude while we take a brief vacation.
The residents of 2068 look back at The Internet, one of the greatest disasters to befall mankind.
The Wu-Tang’s GZA Teaches Kids Science With Least-Lame Classroom Rap Ever.
A surprisingly charming short film about a world where books have gone extinct.
Clearing out the dust as we remodel the Scholarly Kitchen, and introducing two new Chefs.
Social networking and crowdsourcing have attributes that may make them both incompatible with the goals and process of science. Can we accept that?
Though social networking websites continue to proliferate, turning them into sustainable, revenue-generating businesses is still a difficult prospect. For sites based on the illegal distribution of copyrighted material, the process is even more difficult. Is it possible for a pirate to become a respected member of the business community?
The public access policy for the OSTP is announced, and it is even-handed, realistic, designed for rapid implementation, and a sign that the OA movement has matured into one that can work collaboratively to move forward.
The CC-BY license is assumed to be an open access standard, but the situation is complex — for funders, authors, universities, and publishers of all types. Perhaps a less dogmatic approach would serve all parties better.