[…] same way? Is it equally important across all disciplines and publication types? And what about peer review in other research workflows, such as grant applications, conference submissions, promotion and tenure applications, and more? Some efforts to create an instrument for […]
[…] APCs will influence the sustainability of any transformative model involving publishing at the consortial level. Adding or customizing an OA workflow based on APCs for a mostly “Read” consortium may not be cost effective for any particular publisher. OA workflows […]
[…] can now take our metadata and employ automated analysis which could be used to improve many of our processes and workflows. Furthermore, with well-defined calculations, an algorithm can help us solve issues that would take months or years to resolve. […]
[…] Elsevier is developing. As Roger Schonfeld has detailed, Elsevier, Digital Science, and others are all seeking to become a full workflow solution for research and publication, particularly as subscription revenues for publications increasingly appear threatened by open access policies, coordinated […]
[…] availability of open access content, coupled with the potential for systematized efforts to put that open content into the user workflow, could be a mechanism for librarians to gain some control of their budgets and pricing. Generally speaking, there is […]
[…] to more clearly lay out what it means, for example, for a journal to fully integrate ORCID into its publishing workflow. We’ll be hosting more frequent webinars. We’ll be providing more information on new and coming features to our members. […]
[…] so OCR from print introduces errors, editors aren’t put in place for that level of QA and correction, and a workflow tacked on to the end of print becomes the scapegoat. On a separate note about spelling, I wish she […]
[…] watching this video that nearly any journal would vary significantly from any other in a video presentation of its production workflow. Yes, there are some familiar steps, but online has shifted workflows for science journals much more than it has […]
Will the next generation of professions be impressed with the content platforms and workflow tools we currently have? Angela Cochran imagines a world where we meet the challenge of modernized systems.
In Springer Nature’s “botched” IPO, did the market see it as one of the publishers at risk of being left behind by real innovation in scholarly communication and research workflow?
This post is part of a special collaboration between The Scholarly Kitchen’s Mental Health Mondays and EON’s I AM EDITOR. United by a shared commitment to the people who have been called to scholarly publishing, this partnership seeks to amplify conversations about mental health, reduce stigma, and nurture a more supportive, resilient, and connected professional community.
Today, we asked the community: What key message(s) do you want policymakers to take from the responses submitted to the OMB?
Today’s guest bloggers suggest that the involvement of commercial publishers is not unequivocally bad for preprints, and provide some optimism about open access as a whole.
Today’s guest post presents outcomes of the WCRI’s (World Conferences on Research Integrity) Focus Track to address this gap in clarity and standardization of AI disclosure.
The OMB proposed revision is about all research — and humanities research is just as vulnerable as STEM.