From Me to You: Selling Books on a Direct Basis
As more books are sold in electronic form, they will increasingly be marketed on a direct-to-consumer basis.
As more books are sold in electronic form, they will increasingly be marketed on a direct-to-consumer basis.
Let’s put aside all the controversy about open access publishing and come up with an OA plan that will work.
Interview with Kent Anderson on various issues concerning scholarly publishing and the life of the writer.
Technological platform wars have taken control of the book business, and publishers are now collateral damage in the fight.
Jonathan Galassi misses the boat when he tries to argue with authors on moral grounds. Appeal to their pocketbooks.
Kirkus Reviews is doomed. But for all the losses of old ways of discovering books, new ones keep cropping up. The future is bright for book publishing.
Innovations in scholarly communications often come about through bold and often reckless investments in new capacity, for which the utility is not always obvious.
A new initiative for a unifying online catalog of resources is underway. Can it provide a substrate for future innovation?
‘Twas the month before Christmas, and by listening hard, you can hear Joe Esposito yearn for a library card. The reasons are simple, yet give publishers pause. No wonder Joe’s only hope is with Santa Claus.
Complaints against Google miss the point — it’s the Google Era, and publishers who work well with this major upstart have plenty to look forward to.
Publishers are seeking new markets by finding ways to bypass libraries and selling directly to end-users. Do we need new approaches here?
As scholarly communication moves from its frankly printer-centric reality of today, publishers will be faced with many more rounds of improvement to their digital information. Is ePub an answer?
Amazon’s options and pattern of doing business suggests the STM publishers had better prepare for a dramatically more digital future.
A common systemic problem links oversight of financial risks and author-pays peer-review. Both are potentially calamitous.
With an outdated view of information technology, institutional repositories are missing an opportunity to cut costs while they fulfill their missions.