Open Access: No Benefit for Poor Scientists
Authors in developing countries are no more likely to write papers for Open Access journals and are no more likely to cite Open Access articles a new study suggests.
Authors in developing countries are no more likely to write papers for Open Access journals and are no more likely to cite Open Access articles a new study suggests.
A journal begins requiring authors to submit peer-reviewed pages to Wikipedia. Is this a great idea?
Image via CrunchBase Back in May 2008, I wrote about a new publishing venture, 8020 Publishing, and their magazines, Everywhere and JPG. They had an intriguing idea — magazines based on user-submitted (amateur) content. And they had plenty of content, […]
When you have to walk the talk, you end up self-publishing. Can it succeed for a work of fiction?
Has the iPhone put the Kindle in the corner? Or will users be predictably irrational and complicate things for publishers?
Scholarly publishers risk following the newspaper industry if they don’t value peer-review.
The Blackberry Storm looks to be a weak clipper system rather than a hurricane. Meanwhile, the iPhone may be poised to control the weather.
The grim parade of dead magazines — put to music!
YouTube is the #2 search engine in the world. Will digital natives be more video-centric than text-centric?
Content from yesteryear no longer works in the modern world. We have to re-imagine.
Is the fate of print pre-ordained, or an outcome of suicidal circulation strategies?
A major label is now getting most of its revenues from digital sources, but the pie is shrinking. Is it? Or is it just showing how inflated the pie was in the era of fixed media?
The New York Times has 10,000 Kindle subscribers. What else is coming?
Do publishers really believe in what they do? Or have they essentially thrown in the towel?
And apparently, you don’t care about how others do, either.