[…] team dynamics fracture boards and lead to power struggles. Like any effective working group, a board should be comprised of professional peers who respect and work well with each other. Board composition is a serious impediment. Today’s challenges require new perspectives and […]
[…] research infrastructure, to make researchers lives easier, and help them get the credit they need and deserve (for example, for peer review). There’s no shortage of ideas — we have legions of innovators and innovations, tools and services, many developed by […]
[…] getting the tools ready. Meanwhile, if you’ve authored articles, and would like to be able to share them with your peers on request, you can let them know by adding your name on this list (don’t worry, we take spam […]
[…] your own experience as an author, how have you observed power and privilege baked into our processes? I see my peers at all kinds of different institutions have varying degrees of success in landing publishing contracts with university presses, and […]
[…] was how much interest there is in the scholarly process. We spent quite a bit of time, for example, on peer review. Seriously. In the reading group we focus specifically on what kinds of source material the author is drawing on […]
[…] off a piece of itself. There are society members who publish in those journals, others who edit them and provide peer review. While some of this work is compensated (much more than is generally supposed), part of the willingness for society […]
[…] help protect both the academic and publishing community from digital piracy are not only necessary to maintain the credibility of peer–reviewed and updated content but also enable protection against potential harm to end users and the research institutions that serve […]
[…] same lines, so (this time without hesitation!), I turned around to introduce myself and to second her observation. Jasmine Wallace, Peer Review Manager at the American Society for Microbiology, and I then got to talking about what it’s like being a […]
[…] topics of interest to our industry. These two factors come together to form a regular outlet to learn from our peers around the world and break out of my everyday routine. Contributing to the Kitchen pushes me out of my […]
[…] consultant with Origin Editorial. He has a Ph.D. in Evolutionary Ecology and has recently been active at the cutting edge of experimentation in new methods in peer review, data sharing, and reproducibility. Today’s article on open data marks Tim’s return. Tim Vines
[…] are at a very high premium for such a publisher — integrations that will reach up to and including editorial, peer review, and other traditional publishing activities. Workflow Integration Depending on the objectives of the provider, there are several ways that […]
[…] can help to challenge assumptions about candidates or identify qualities in applicants that have traditionally been undervalued. On retention Establish peer support groups. Set aside both the time and budget to allow underrepresented groups and their allies to meet. The […]
[…] at the top of scholarly publishing, as well as several scholarly studies that clearly demonstrate gender bias in authorship and peer review (see here, here, and here, for example), have helped draw attention to the issue of gender diversity. Other forms […]
[…] their articles are being handled. Researchers want to know that the publisher they’re sending their work to is actually conducting peer–review. They might ask how many reviewers per article are there, and how many rounds take place on average? They […]
[…] The switching costs associated with the collaboration environments in Hivebench and Mendeley derive from a network effect with one’s research peers and collaborators. One’s data and notes are stored and deposited in systems that, even if they allow ready export, […]