[…] all, the services that Facebook and Google offer are free (if you don’t consider giving up your personal data and privacy rights to be a cost). However, academics have documented how these companies employ far fewer people than the largest […]
[…] its online advertising drives offline sales via credit card data tied back to user accounts might cross a line for privacy advocates, but it fits with the company’s overall drive to “organize the world’s information” — which is increasingly for […]
[…] even of its users and authors. To take one particularly dramatic example, when publishers capitulated to libraries’ demands for end-user privacy, they effectively outsourced to libraries the authentication of users. The result was Sci-Hub. The “fee-for-services” model. Every publisher uses […]
[…] its acceptable use on human beings. Other professions all have a code of ethics. Librarians are taught to hold patron privacy, doctors pledge to “first, do no harm.” Lawyers, for all the bad jokes about them, are officers of the […]
[…] audience. This might assist other students looking for content or even faculty in creating course packs. Of course, there are privacy issues and as much as I don’t want my general internet usage patterns to be sold to third parties, […]
[…] for new ventures, and the larger companies are often caught in bureaucratic red tape. New layers of bureaucracy (audit, legal, compliance, privacy) lead to dithering that slows disruptors, as desires to manage cash flows and cash reserves during times of uncertainty […]
[…] of individuals keeps us from thinking this way, but there are ways to thrive in a data business while safeguarding privacy. This may be a good topic when you sit down for your next strategic planning session. Does OA need to […]
[…] Obama is the only author listed or acknowledged. There are certainly many other factors around the author attribution decision — security, privacy, and other factors play a role. Solo authorship may also be a form of protection in these unusual cases. […]
[…] Social Networking Services–An Exploration of Their Potential as a Platform for Multi-disciplinary Collaboration. In 2011 IEEE Third International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust (PASSAT) (pp. 545-548). Washington: IEEE Computer Society. Zaugg, H., West, R. E., Tateishi, I. and […]
[…] into connected systems, such as funder reporting systems and university repositories (re-use many times). We will also be underlining the privacy angle. As so much of our lives is online these days, we all expect to be able to control […]
[…] Long live the new Web. The web of people as nodes, connected to each other via Mobile (and cloud powered, privacy gobbling) compute devices. And I read these articles and their conflicting and contentious views on what constitutes good monetization […]
[…] up in your Facebook or Google+ stream. I’m digitally literate enough to know how to silo my contacts and configure privacy settings to ensure that there is a Chinese wall between my personal and professional lives. But there’s a lot packed […]
[…] to September 10, 2001, before all the security theater was put in place. Yes, it’s something of an invasion of privacy (fingerprints are required) but the upside of being stuck in traffic and arriving at JFK 20 minutes before a […]
[…] that require support? This is indeed a promising area, but it comes with certain restrictions. First and most importantly, the privacy issues here are huge; any organization that does not have a carefully thought-out policy is going to run into […]
[…] apply to TDM vary by jurisdiction. In addition to copyright, other areas of laws that may govern text mining include privacy, trade secrets, and contract. Again, the applicability of these areas of law will vary by jurisdiction. References: Grimes, Seth, […]