The AI Slop Overload Does Not Taste Good
AI-generated recipes are taking over the internet. How do they taste?
AI-generated recipes are taking over the internet. How do they taste?
If LLMs are the future of information discovery, valuable scholarly content risks being left behind — unless we build a bridge with better licensing.
Data sonification is the process of translating data into sound. Here, Lutz Bornmann and Christian Leibel present the sonified results of a recent analysis of the impact of scientific team size on innovation.
Guest blogger, Ashutosh Ghildiyal, asks: Is AI for us, or are we for AI? In the all-important context of peer review, can we leverage AI to amplify human thought rather than replace us?
A report from this year’s Fiesole Retreat: Learning from the Past, Informing the Future.
A summary of the European Association of Science Editors (EASE) debate session, where Haseeb Irfanullah argued in favor of a motion declaring that journal editors do not need to worry about preventing the spread of misinformation, while Are Brean argued against it.
AI Bots are overwhelming server capacity and impeding access to collections. How big is the problem and what solutions exist?
In today’s post, three Scholarly Kitchen Chefs — Haseeb Irfanullah, Phill Jones, and Alice Meadows — report on the recent European Association of Science Editors (EASE) Conference (Oslo, May 14-16).
NISO issues a report on workshops looking to improve the efficiency of working with AI systems in scholarly publishing
How does the Directory of Open Access Books navigate challenges to instill trust and transparency. Part 1 of 2.
The French Open Science Monitor Initiative shows a path toward improving recognition of data sharing and open science assessment.
A comprehensive set of recommendations designed to support researchers, peer-reviewed journals, and funding bodies in systematically incorporating intersectional perspectives have been formalized in the Guidelines for Intersectional Analysis in Science and Technology (GIST). Here we interview Londa Schiebinger, co-author of the Guidelines.
Editor’s Note: Today’s post is by Ashutosh Ghildiyal, Ashutosh is a strategic leader in scholarly publishing with over 18 years of experience driving sustainable growth and global market expansion. He currently serves as Vice President of Growth and Strategy at […]
Changes in Library of Congress leadership could have profound impacts on copyright and intellectual freedom.
The most vital and enduring contribution of scholarly publishers is their role as gatekeepers — not as obstacles to knowledge but as stewards of quality, integrity, and trust.