E-Readers Will Take Centerstage If Prices Drop, Yet Publishers Still Have Two Left Feet
E-readers are poised to go mainstream, yet publishers continue to be wallflowers. Haven’t we learned to dance at all during this last digital decade?
E-readers are poised to go mainstream, yet publishers continue to be wallflowers. Haven’t we learned to dance at all during this last digital decade?
One year later, Twitter’s business services plans seem to be rolling out.
A new economic analysis of the time spent realizing a four-year degree shows decreases across the board since 1961. What does it mean? Why is it happening?
A short video of the myriad ways to pronounce “moleskine,” the name of a favorite notebook.
Facebook argues that its erosions of privacy reflect changing social norms. But is what it’s doing just plain wrong?
Cognitive bias is on display all around us. Which one are you seeing? This song teaches you the differences.
While building a new poetry center, construction stops so Bill Murray can share a few poems (and jokes) with the workers. A lovely moment, captured in video.
Does the power of prestige and prestige-granting organization confound the politics of the Web?
How we measure quality may be a form of vestigial elitism, stemming from the print age. And it may be holding us back.
Is editorial knowledge generation the last “production shop” available for digital improvement?
In less than a minute, essential advice for survival today and success tomorrow.
The Webby Awards’ People’s Voice competition is now over, and our little blog made a respectable showing, thanks to all your support.
The e-book age is here — infrastructure, readers, storefronts. Publishers should heed the warning signs and stop delaying the inevitable.
The OUP has launched Oxford Bibliographies Online, hoping to filter major fields down to a high-quality, peer-reviewed reference kick-start. But does a wordy filter actually filter in the networked world?
The Public Library of Science was once a radical force, but is now dependent on author-pays bulk-publishing for its livelihood, which introduces all sorts of problems for every journal publisher. What went wrong?