Is the Facebook Platform Dead?
Once touted as Platform 2.0, Facebook is now suffocating its applications to make room for a new growth strategy every Web publisher should see coming.
Once touted as Platform 2.0, Facebook is now suffocating its applications to make room for a new growth strategy every Web publisher should see coming.
News is breaking. How it’s breaking holds lessons for customer-centric scholarly publishers.
A recent PLoS Medicine article claims that information economics distort science. But maybe it’s an obsession with journals distorting the views of the authors.
Is your brand truly one brand in the digital world? Or has the new media space fractured it?
Elsevier’s Article 2.0 experiment is a nice idea built on a faulty approach. It may even be cynical.
Autumns dangers are upon us! Watch this report for a full appreciation of the risks!!
Are we in the early days of a new Renaissance? One keen observer agrees, and trends point in that direction.
Is peer review in decline? Evidence from the field of economics suggests that top authors are bypassing the journal certification process and distributing their papers on their own. Will other authors follow?
Editors still write headlines like they’re for print and people. With online, headlines shift to a new environment and have at least two more audiences.
The link is the currency of the Web. Give users more to spend, and they’ll reward you with loyalty.
UAL loses $1 billion in value, thanks to the power of apomediation combined with a mess in the metadata.
Google Knol may be just author infomercials, not a vibrant reference work with accountability.
Lies inserted into Wikipedia get corrected quickly, a small study finds.
Disintermediation presupposes the intermediation is the only choice. Maybe apomediation is the destination.
Position in a daily arXiv email report can determine future citations. A German physicist struggles to determine why.