The Collapse of Peer Review
Is peer review in decline? Evidence from the field of economics suggests that top authors are bypassing the journal certification process and distributing their papers on their own. Will other authors follow?
Is peer review in decline? Evidence from the field of economics suggests that top authors are bypassing the journal certification process and distributing their papers on their own. Will other authors follow?
Editors still write headlines like they’re for print and people. With online, headlines shift to a new environment and have at least two more audiences.
The link is the currency of the Web. Give users more to spend, and they’ll reward you with loyalty.
UAL loses $1 billion in value, thanks to the power of apomediation combined with a mess in the metadata.
Google Knol may be just author infomercials, not a vibrant reference work with accountability.
Lies inserted into Wikipedia get corrected quickly, a small study finds.
Disintermediation presupposes the intermediation is the only choice. Maybe apomediation is the destination.
Position in a daily arXiv email report can determine future citations. A German physicist struggles to determine why.
Web 2.0 may be shattering the established control of elite media. In their place are loud and aggressive voices.
Scholarly publishers have traditionally focused on articles, issues, subscriptions, citations, impact factors, and business models. But maybe by focusing on these things, which are much more about us than about our readers (who are becoming users today, a significant shift […]
In the best-designed study of this topic yet, no citation advantage emerges for OA articles.
Google Knols launched with a lot of splash, but is it a small fish?
The proliferation of Web 2.0 and social networking tools has made it clear that the functionality is being baked into the substance of the Web. But, who is using these tools in the scholarly community? A recent blog entry on […]
Blogging, like journalism, amplifies the dissemination of scientific information. But tensions still exist between bloggers and the mainstream media.
A paper examines faulty citations, but the authors are on shaky ground.