Funding UK Research
The Research Assessment Exercise is slow and expensive. Abandoning peer-review for quantitative assessment may lead to excessive gaming and corrupt the indicators of quality.
The Research Assessment Exercise is slow and expensive. Abandoning peer-review for quantitative assessment may lead to excessive gaming and corrupt the indicators of quality.
The abuse of editorial power and favoritism leads to a national scandal in France.
Scholarly publishers risk following the newspaper industry if they don’t value peer-review.
Sure, the news is a commodity now, but perhaps losing the data is what triggered the beginning of the end for newspapers.
Improving transparency and accountability in biomedical publishing has turned authorship into a legal system.
Professionalism of science has given face to invisible technicians and collaborators and can partly explain the growth in authorship.
Content from yesteryear no longer works in the modern world. We have to re-imagine.
Can nearly 3,000 individuals really be authors on a single paper?
Google’s new SearchWiki implementation has grabbed some attention, but will it actually make a difference to users?
What can be learned about science and publishing from the El Naschie controversy?
Controversial self-publishing editor, El Naschie, to step down in 2009. Professional affiliations cast in doubt.
Obama is to Roosevelt as YouTube is to radio = a major moment in communications.
Bow down before your duly elected and merciful leader.
Open source has come to hardware, illustrating again why the lessons still don’t apply to scholarship.
Why the market for scholarly articles looks a lot like the market for used cars.