Social Networking – Tips, Tricks, and Talent
When a group of publishers sits down to discuss social networking, there are many insights to be had.
When a group of publishers sits down to discuss social networking, there are many insights to be had.
Adam Bly’s keynote exhorts us to embrace a digital future of collaboration and multidisciplinary science. And a few announcements.
Has free access to content outlived its usefulness as a way of getting noticed?
Books made the traditional way accounted for less than 50% of US book production in 2008. Has the sea change come?
A recent study shows that article tagging actually decreases recall of content. This points out the inelegance of most social media tools, where the act of using the tool becomes paramount over the activity it’s supposed to aid.
Academic freedom cited as main counter-argument.
The Google Books Settlement has publishers up in arms over copyright and content presentation. They need to wake up and smell the coffee. That’s not what Google’s after.
Consumers are adopting e-books, and even as the base grows, the growth rate is phenomenal. It might be the year for a big shift.
David Crotty introduces himself and provides insights into what drives him.
While university presses shrink and go digital, are they trying to preserve a structural memory in the face of a modern reality?
The MLA’s seventh edition style guide knocks print from its pedestal and dethrones the URL for citations. In other words, its editors get real.
When information was scarce, it needed copyright protection. When it’s abundant and a service, is it relevant anymore? Really?
We’re in the early days of a major revolution in information dissemination and creation. Clay Shirky shows us why we need to think the unthinkable.
Image via CrunchBase Part of the reason I wanted to self-publish my first mystery novel was to learn what modern self-publishing could accomplish on a shoestring budget. And I was particularly interested in Amazon‘s role in the world of booksellers. […]
Would an Open Access publisher accept a nonsensical paper if the author were willing to pay?