Ouroboros and Peer Review: New Proposals Continue to Chase Their Own Tails
Can social reputation metrics provide a meaningful incentive for researcher participation in peer-review and online commentary?
Can social reputation metrics provide a meaningful incentive for researcher participation in peer-review and online commentary?
Improving participation in peer-review may be a matter of finding the right combination of incentives.
When authors are unwilling to peer review and incentives are not enough, is it time to privatize the system?
What happens when a proposed solution for a problem becomes an end unto itself? Is peer review really more important than research itself?