Logical Fallacies and Internet Comments
After a few weeks of blistering comment sections on Scholarly Kitchen posts, it’s probably time to review the most common logical fallacies employed in arguing on the internet.
After a few weeks of blistering comment sections on Scholarly Kitchen posts, it’s probably time to review the most common logical fallacies employed in arguing on the internet.
Physicist Brian Greene explains a recent scientific breakthrough to Stephen Colbert.
The story of physicist Richard Feynman, “The Great Explainer”.
“Conversations In Genetics” offers a treasure trove of material to historians of science.
A spate of open access “big deals” marks a shift from global offsetting to local offsetting. But the secretive nature of these deals makes them difficult to interpret.
A remarkable story (with a remarkable punchline) from the great geneticist, Mary Claire-King.
A visit with Bob Dorough, 92, the man who set education to song for a generation in the US.
A quantum chess death match between Stephen Hawking and actor Paul Rudd. Did I mention the fate of humanity hangs in the balance?
Do we need more metrics, or can some questions be answered more easily?
If you tried to make a book from scratch, how would you do it?
A short film on the need for accurate statistical analysis and data availability.
The hidden costs of data availability policies.
Victoria Belmont talks about what happens when something you do online is taken out of context and becomes part of the internet’s permanent memory.
A farewell to 2015, and some thoughts on why our culture has, in an age of abundance, slowed down so much.
Steven Pinker discusses a better model for more effective prose, particularly for academic authors.