Researchers And Social Media: Uptake Increases When Obvious Benefits Result
A study of social media adoption hides some sensible lessons within a jumble of other signals.
A study of social media adoption hides some sensible lessons within a jumble of other signals.
New publishing initiatives link concepts like “importance” to social metrics like popularity and sharing. Is this logical? Can these metrics be easily gamed?
After wondering at the supposed burden of peer-review, more evidence emerged that it still works well, and is probably less taxing than other alternatives.
The false premise of replacement means the future isn’t destructive, just additive.
Another science blogging network implodes, a sign that the age of exuberance is giving way to the business realities.
Is our future defined by third-party aggregators? Or is there a business opportunity there worth fighting for?
Despite hand-wringing about the Times UK’s paywall, the numbers show that revenues may have justified the move.
Can social reputation metrics provide a meaningful incentive for researcher participation in peer-review and online commentary?
What happens when a proposed solution for a problem becomes an end unto itself? Is peer review really more important than research itself?
Do the benefits of peer review outweigh the work involved? How does post-publication review stack up in comparison?
Open blogging networks may be impossible to commercialize, for a host of reasons.
The Research Information Network’s new report on researchers and Web 2.0 offers a similar set of results to previous studies: uptake is relatively low, and the trustworthiness and quality of online resources are suspect. The report offers contrary evidence to common myths about “digital natives” and some useful advice for anyone looking to build social media.
The science blogosphere erupted in a furor this week, when Seed Media’s ScienceBlogs announced a new blog–Food Frontiers, a paid, sponsored blog about nutrition written by employees of PepsiCo. Multiple bloggers either suspended their blogs or quit ScienceBlogs altogether over their concerns that adding this blog undermined the credibility of the platform and their credibility as individual writers. Eventually, ScienceBlogs caved under the pressure and removed Pepsi’s blog. Did ScienceBlogs sell out to commercial interests, or was this just a continuation of what they’ve always done?
Apple announces a new model iPhone and an updated operating system for all iPhones/iPads/iPod Touch devices. What impact will these new technologies have on publishers?
How can publishers maximize the value and reach of their content using new technologies? The ACS, Cell Press, and PubGet offer their solutions.