The Scholarly Kitchen

What’s Hot and Cooking In Scholarly Publishing

  • About
  • Archives
  • Collections
    Scholarly Publishing 101 -- The Basics
    Collections
    • Scholarly Publishing 101 -- The Basics
    • Academia
    • Business Models
    • Discovery and Access
    • Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility
    • Economics
    • Libraries
    • Marketing
    • Mental Health Awareness
    • Metrics and Analytics
    • Open Access
    • Organizational Management
    • Peer Review
    • Strategic Planning
    • Technology and Disruption
  • Translations
    topographic world map
    Translations
    • All Translations
    • Chinese
    • German
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Spanish
  • Chefs
  • Podcast
  • Follow

Phil Davis

The Mismeasure of Man, Funds, and Open Access Experiments

After one year, most COPE funds remain unspent. Is it time to revise the policy?

  • By Phil Davis
  • Aug 10, 2010
  • 12 Comments
  • Time To Read: 3 mins

Pubget Continues to Puzzle and Diversify

Pubget still seems like a technology in search of a problem or a solution in search of a viable business model.

  • By Phil Davis
  • Aug 6, 2010
  • 2 Comments
  • Time To Read: 3 mins

No Deposit, No Diploma: How Graduate Schools and Libraries Restrict Access to Dissertations and Theses

Outdated and arbitrary e-filing policies create lengthy access embargoes to university research.

  • By Phil Davis
  • Jul 22, 2010
  • 16 Comments
  • Time To Read: 4 mins

Post-Publication Review: Does It Add Anything New and Useful?

Post-publication review is spotty, unreliable, and may suffer from cronyism, several studies reveal.

  • By Phil Davis
  • Jul 14, 2010
  • 68 Comments
  • Time To Read: 3 mins

Impact Factor Inflation: When an Increase is Actually a Decrease

Journals that fail to keep up with background Impact Factor inflation may actually be losing ground.

  • By Phil Davis
  • Jul 12, 2010
  • 5 Comments
  • Time To Read: 2 mins

PLoS ONE: Is a High Impact Factor a Blessing or a Curse?

PLoS ONE’s relatively high impact factor may compromise its ability to support PLoS Biology and PLoS Medicine.

  • By Phil Davis
  • Jun 21, 2010
  • 84 Comments
  • Time To Read: 5 mins

Impact Factors — A Self-fulfilling Prophecy?

A new study analyzing the citation performance of identical articles in multiple sources provides new insight into the causes of citation. But does it accomplish its goals?

  • By Phil Davis
  • Jun 9, 2010
  • 8 Comments
  • Time To Read: 3 mins

Forgetting the F-bomb: How Cheap Memory Makes Normal Conference Chat Costly

An argument for why conferences should not be recorded and rebroadcast.

  • By Phil Davis
  • Jun 7, 2010
  • 7 Comments
  • Time To Read: 3 mins

Lessons Learned and Lessons Learning: STM Stalwarts Reflect on Career Paths and Making Choices

In an industry where energy, youth, and innovation are often valued over experience, what can be learned from a panel of wizened members of the publishing industry?

  • By Phil Davis
  • Jun 3, 2010
  • 0 Comments
  • Time To Read: 2 mins

In Search of Sustainability: Business Models in Publishing

Experimentation and choice are key to finding long-term sustainability.

  • By Phil Davis
  • Jun 3, 2010
  • 0 Comments
  • Time To Read: 2 mins

Applications: The Future of Science Communication?

“Building apps is not all unicorns and rainbows.” Publishers should take a practical, iterative, and collaborative approach to delivering content.

  • By Phil Davis
  • Jun 3, 2010
  • 1 Comment
  • Time To Read: < 1 min

Kahle: Distributed Services a Solution to Monopoly Control

“Scholarly publishing is too important to be monopolized!” Solution to digitization is decentralized commerce.

  • By Phil Davis
  • Jun 3, 2010
  • 1 Comment
  • Time To Read: < 1 min

The Stick and the Carrot: Why Direct Incentives in Science are Dangerous

Reputation — fragile, cumulative, and indirect — is the reward of science. Direct compensation to motivate specific behaviors is a dangerous proposal.

  • By Phil Davis
  • May 13, 2010
  • 13 Comments
  • Time To Read: 3 mins

Industry Sponsorship of Open Access Articles

The willingness of industry to sponsor open access articles may bias your access to reliable health information.

  • By Phil Davis
  • May 3, 2010
  • 20 Comments
  • Time To Read: 2 mins

The Paranoia of Publication “Bias” — How a Study Proves Its Point by Making Its Point

Positive research results may indicate that the scientific system is working efficiently.

  • By Phil Davis
  • Apr 27, 2010
  • 23 Comments
  • Time To Read: 2 mins

Posts pagination

Prev 1 … 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 … 24 Next

Official Blog of:

Society for Scholarly Publishing (SSP)

The Chefs

  • Rick Anderson
  • Todd A Carpenter
  • Angela Cochran
  • Lettie Y. Conrad
  • David Crotty
  • Ashutosh Ghildiyal
  • Roohi Ghosh
  • Robert Harington
  • Haseeb Irfanullah
  • Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe
  • Phill Jones
  • Roy Kaufman
  • Scholarly Kitchen
  • Stephanie Lovegrove Hansen
  • Alice Meadows
  • Alison Mudditt
  • Charlie Rapple
  • Dianndra Roberts
  • Maryam Sayab
  • Roger C. Schonfeld
  • Avi Staiman
  • Randy Townsend
  • Tim Vines
  • Hong Zhou

Interested in writing for The Scholarly Kitchen? Learn more.

Most Recent

  • Ask the Chefs: AI and Copyright Licensing
  • Guest Post — The Unbundling of Scholarly Publishing: A Trilemma for the AI Era
  • Up Close and Personal with the Trump Administration’s NIH Funding Cuts: An Interview with Sylvia Chou and Alexa Romberg

SSP News

The SSP Mentorship Program is Open – Apply Today

Sep 8, 2026

Latest “Pulse Check” Poll focuses on Research Integrity in Scholarly Communications

Sep 1, 2026
Follow the Scholarly Kitchen Blog Follow Us
Society for Scholarly Publishing (SSP)

The mission of the Society for Scholarly Publishing (SSP) is to advance scholarly publishing and communication, and the professional development of its members through education, collaboration, and networking. SSP established The Scholarly Kitchen blog in February 2008 to keep SSP members and interested parties aware of new developments in publishing.

The Scholarly Kitchen is a moderated and independent blog. Opinions on The Scholarly Kitchen are those of the authors. They are not necessarily those held by the Society for Scholarly Publishing nor by their respective employers.

  • About
  • Archives
  • Chefs
  • Podcast
  • Follow
  • Advertising
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Website Credits
ISSN 2690-8085