The Scholarly Kitchen

What’s Hot and Cooking In Scholarly Publishing

  • About
  • Archives
  • Collections
    Scholarly Publishing 101 -- The Basics
    Collections
    • Scholarly Publishing 101 -- The Basics
    • Academia
    • Business Models
    • Discovery and Access
    • Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility
    • Economics
    • Libraries
    • Marketing
    • Mental Health Awareness
    • Metrics and Analytics
    • Open Access
    • Organizational Management
    • Peer Review
    • Strategic Planning
    • Technology and Disruption
  • Translations
    topographic world map
    Translations
    • All Translations
    • Chinese
    • German
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Spanish
  • Chefs
  • Podcast
  • Follow

Phil Davis

Openness and Secrecy in Science — A Careful Balance

If openness is an ideological tenant of science, why are scientists so secretive?

  • By Phil Davis
  • Oct 25, 2010
  • 5 Comments
  • Time To Read: 3 mins

Can Open Access Journals Guarantee Sound Methods?

Stating that open access journals publish papers with “sound methodologies” promotes an unrealistic view of the scientific process and a corrupted image of the editorial and peer-review process.

  • By Phil Davis
  • Oct 19, 2010
  • 34 Comments
  • Time To Read: 4 mins

Cascading Peer-Review — The Future of Open Access?

BMJ Open is marketed as high-volume journal of rejects. Did BMJ miss on marketing or is this the future of open access publishing?

  • By Phil Davis
  • Oct 12, 2010
  • 31 Comments
  • Time To Read: 3 mins

When the Love of Books Doesn’t Increase Sales or Citations

Free online books may increase discovery, but may not translate into increased sales or citations, a new study reports.

  • By Phil Davis
  • Sep 29, 2010
  • 9 Comments
  • Time To Read: 2 mins

Feeding the Sharks — C2C Wins Venture Capital

SSP IN conference ends with presentations of five new “dream e-Tools.” Will the panel of venture capitalists take the bait?

  • By Phil Davis
  • Sep 27, 2010
  • 2 Comments
  • Time To Read: 5 mins

Personas, Process, and Venture Capitalists

Successfully developing a new product often means understanding the interests of other stakeholders.

  • By Phil Davis
  • Sep 22, 2010
  • 1 Comment
  • Time To Read: 2 mins

State of the Art II — The Future of Technology in the Classroom

Harvard’s Paul Bergen: “The slow accretion of technology into the educational system is the result of the teacher and not the learner.”

  • By Phil Davis
  • Sep 22, 2010
  • 2 Comments
  • Time To Read: 2 mins

State of the Art I — The Future of Academic Librarians

ACRL’s Kara Malenfant to publishers: “Don’t think of librarians as those who hold the purse-strings, because that is not how librarians view themselves.”

  • By Phil Davis
  • Sep 22, 2010
  • 4 Comments
  • Time To Read: 2 mins

Games, eBooks, and Innovation — The Game Is Not the Same

“What we’ve called a ‘game’ has radically changed,” expressed Ariella Lehrer, president and CEO of Legacy Interactive, at the breakfast keynote talk at the 2010 SSP IN meeting. Lehrer, a 27-year veteran of the gaming industry, began her talk with […]

  • By Phil Davis
  • Sep 22, 2010
  • 1 Comment
  • Time To Read: 2 mins

Imagining the Dream e-Tool for Education and Training

The keynote of the SSP IN meeting inadvertently raises a question — Is it possible to market new e-learning tools without blaming teachers or the educational system?

  • By Phil Davis
  • Sep 22, 2010
  • 14 Comments
  • Time To Read: 2 mins

Are Peer-Reviewers Overloaded? Or Are Their Incentives Misaligned?

Improving participation in peer-review may be a matter of finding the right combination of incentives.

  • By Phil Davis
  • Sep 21, 2010
  • 15 Comments
  • Time To Read: 2 mins

Privatizing Peer Review — The PubCred Proposal

When authors are unwilling to peer review and incentives are not enough, is it time to privatize the system?

  • By Phil Davis
  • Sep 16, 2010
  • 31 Comments
  • Time To Read: 4 mins

Post-publication Review: Is the Dialog of Science Really a Monologue?

It has never been easier to post a comment to a scientific article. Just don’t expect an adequate reply from the author — or one at all — according to a new study.

  • By Phil Davis
  • Sep 10, 2010
  • 18 Comments
  • Time To Read: 3 mins

Reference List Length and Citations: A Spurious Relationship

Like ice-cream and murder, there is no causal relationship between reference length and citations. Now go tell Nature.

  • By Phil Davis
  • Aug 18, 2010
  • 10 Comments
  • Time To Read: 3 mins

Ending the Supplemental Data “Arms Race”

Supplemental data undermine scientific integrity by undermining the peer review process.

  • By Phil Davis
  • Aug 16, 2010
  • 21 Comments
  • Time To Read: 3 mins

Posts pagination

Prev 1 … 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 … 24 Next

Official Blog of:

Society for Scholarly Publishing (SSP)

The Chefs

  • Rick Anderson
  • Todd A Carpenter
  • Angela Cochran
  • Lettie Y. Conrad
  • David Crotty
  • Ashutosh Ghildiyal
  • Roohi Ghosh
  • Robert Harington
  • Haseeb Irfanullah
  • Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe
  • Phill Jones
  • Roy Kaufman
  • Scholarly Kitchen
  • Stephanie Lovegrove Hansen
  • Alice Meadows
  • Alison Mudditt
  • Charlie Rapple
  • Dianndra Roberts
  • Maryam Sayab
  • Roger C. Schonfeld
  • Avi Staiman
  • Randy Townsend
  • Tim Vines
  • Hong Zhou

Interested in writing for The Scholarly Kitchen? Learn more.

Most Recent

  • Guest Post — AI Can Find the Article. Can It Tell Which Version It Used?
  • Guest Post — Preserving the Record, Shaping the Future: Why Diversity Matters in Digital Preservation
  • Guest Post — When Errors Become Consensus: Science’s Self-Correction Can No Longer Keep Up

SSP News

Latest “Pulse Check” Results Reveal Diverse Approaches to Social Media

Jul 20, 2026

SSP Joins Nearly Half Million Comments in Opposition of Proposed OMB Revisions

Jul 15, 2026
Follow the Scholarly Kitchen Blog Follow Us
Society for Scholarly Publishing (SSP)

The mission of the Society for Scholarly Publishing (SSP) is to advance scholarly publishing and communication, and the professional development of its members through education, collaboration, and networking. SSP established The Scholarly Kitchen blog in February 2008 to keep SSP members and interested parties aware of new developments in publishing.

The Scholarly Kitchen is a moderated and independent blog. Opinions on The Scholarly Kitchen are those of the authors. They are not necessarily those held by the Society for Scholarly Publishing nor by their respective employers.

  • About
  • Archives
  • Chefs
  • Podcast
  • Follow
  • Advertising
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Website Credits
ISSN 2690-8085