Google Book Settlement — Opponents 1, Google 0
The Google Books Settlement hits a barrier. The implications of this will need to be sorted out over the coming days and weeks.
The Google Books Settlement hits a barrier. The implications of this will need to be sorted out over the coming days and weeks.
Innovation requires planning for adoption. Publishers can win in the long-haul by following maps others have drawn.
The HarperCollins e-book lending limitations provide lessons in how both sides typically deal with change.
When you explore the revenue model of e-books vs. print books, some pricing practices make sense. But when you factor in the expenses, the logic begins to break down.
The new Google Ebooks have made a mess of many popular classics in the public domain.
A fascinating talk from last month’s O’Reilly Tools of Change conference, in which Kevin Kelly talks about how the proliferation of screens, the incorporation of gestures and voice, the abundance of data streams, the notion of “always on,” and so […]
While it seems that availability drives down the quality of information goods, some exceptions make it clear this is not an unavoidable fate. Can scientific publishing beat the trend?
A report by the AAUP outlines the business models available to university presses and makes a case for ongoing subsidies by parent institutions.
The revolution in book publishing shares some aspects with revolutions everywhere. Here’s a short slideshow by the founder of Smashwords examining current motivations for authors.
How can you make a movie about why some writing is good, some bad? This trailer makes it seem not only possible, but interesting.
A new report from OCLC underscores how much water is already over, and how fragile the foundation has become.
A talk by Margaret Atwood which reminds us that authors are not to be overlooked as we charge ahead with changes in publishing — and that change itself requires thoughtful choices.
Customers have accepted the analogy that they “buy” e-books, but publishers may be faced with accepting the fact that they’re selling licenses. What this could mean to their bottom lines may not be the most painful part of this shift.
For scholars to excel in the information age, technology needs to learn to learn. Perhaps highly specialized humans can help.
A debate at PSP reveals much, especially after it ends.