John Wilbanks: It’s the Customer, Not the Container — SSP IN Keynote
John Wilbanks from Creative Commons tells us to stop concentrating on the container and begin concentrating on the customer.
John Wilbanks from Creative Commons tells us to stop concentrating on the container and begin concentrating on the customer.
The Google Books Settlement deadline is upon us. What did you choose?
A Trojan horse argument about links misses the point — copyright and contracts reach farther.
An initiative to see if free K-12 textbooks in math and science could exist, California tested the waters. The results have been released. They’re surprising, and may portend changes for educational publishers.
Two court decisions assign enormous fines for infringing copyright by sharing songs online. Is this a sign that the public is not as jaded about copyright as we’ve been led to believe?
Feudalism was a necessary step in social organization, but is it the end-state for academic organization? A number of related events this past weekend make me think not.
Lawsuits against British rock band, Coldplay, illustrate the blurred distinction between inspiration and theft.
Academic freedom cited as main counter-argument.
While the entertainment industry calls for tightening control of intellectual property, academic publishers are accepting alternative solutions to ownership. Is there a future for publishing?
Expensive, proprietary systems are no basis of a successful business strategy.
The Google Books Settlement has publishers up in arms over copyright and content presentation. They need to wake up and smell the coffee. That’s not what Google’s after.
The NIH Public Access Policy debate can be better understood through the lenses of competing Intellectual Property theories.
We need to shake ourselves from the metaphor of Intellectual Property and create a new way of viewing information.
The Google Books Settlement has authors up in arms. I’m an author now, and I don’t know what they’re so upset about.
Journal authors have more rights than they. Why is this disjoint dangerous and what can publishers do?