Are Open Access Initiatives "Catastrophic" for Commercial Publishers?
An analyst frets that Elsevier might suffer from the trends in OA publishing and its mandates. But there’s no logical or practical reason to believe this.
An analyst frets that Elsevier might suffer from the trends in OA publishing and its mandates. But there’s no logical or practical reason to believe this.
When someone is treated unfairly — through pay discrimination — it’s so obvious, even a primate knows it.
While block grants may be a preferred way to disperse money to fund public access mandates, their actual use may cause problems for researchers and universities.
Perhaps poor presentations aren’t caused by the tools, but the content and delivery. PowerPoint or Prezi can’t cover for those problems.
With changes in the scholarly communications world, many old questions for the library are unsettled once again, and many news ones arise. In this first part of a two-part post, we’ll ask the questions.
Udacity students can now transfer credits to Colorado State. Is this the start of something big?
In addition to what publishers do directly for authors and readers, they foster many collaborative and philanthropic efforts around the world.
Want disco lights? Squids might be on your path to dance club heaven.
The publication of short works opens up new opportunities for academic publishers that heretofore have had to choose between the forms of the article on one hand and the full-length book on the other.
After a summer full of interesting posts and time to think, a bit of reflection seems in order as we head into Fall.
Books and book chapters have a competitive disadvantage in citations, but it’s not accessibility that makes the difference — there are more reasons, and more changes needed.
A new high-speed camera has the potential to reveal the world of light in completely novel ways. This video is amazing from start to finish.
The recent proliferation of -omics words amuses some, annoys others, and perhaps signals an effort at integrating new areas.
The “listener support” model works in some cases. This fact alone suggests it may not have a robust future in the funding of scholarly initiatives.
Self-explanatory, but remarkably humorous in the best way — it makes you sympathize and empathize while still chuckling.