The Wrong Approach: Harrisburg University Bans Social Networking to “See What Happens”
A provost sees multi-tasking in his home, and decides to make his university suffer — all because he took the wrong lesson to heart.
A provost sees multi-tasking in his home, and decides to make his university suffer — all because he took the wrong lesson to heart.
CrossRef announces a new system in conjunction with New York’s Fashion Week.
There’s still time to get “IN.”
What happens when a proposed solution for a problem becomes an end unto itself? Is peer review really more important than research itself?
The infrastructure for change is in place and largely working. What might that mean for publishing and academic cultures? (The first of a four-part series.)
Nonprofit organizations are being asked to measure their social impact. Can they respond to these new challenges?
An article’s authors and a journal’s editor are surprised when a puff-piece backfires. Thanks for the pretentious seriousness, blogosphere.
Supplemental data undermine scientific integrity by undermining the peer review process.
A town in the UK abandons traffic lights, to surprising effect.
Previous experience with information traveling so fast it goes out of control suggests that part of filtering includes managing release points.
After one year, most COPE funds remain unspent. Is it time to revise the policy?
Open blogging networks may be impossible to commercialize, for a host of reasons.
A recent infographic from OCLC shifts the value considerations for libraries into a potentially risky realm, a mismeasure of value that’s just not necessary.
Consumers have demonstrated a willingness to pay for targeted, virtual goods and services. Why are publishers still trying to foist low-value generalized content off to them?
When brands, credibility, and trust all stumble, what is an increasingly weary public supposed to think?