Traditional Measures of Quality: Irrelevant, Miscast, Outdated, and Inhibiting?
How we measure quality may be a form of vestigial elitism, stemming from the print age. And it may be holding us back.
How we measure quality may be a form of vestigial elitism, stemming from the print age. And it may be holding us back.
Image by jdlasica via Flickr For scholarly publishers, librarians, and readers, the article remains the coin of the realm — a text-based narrative that strips data of all but its most superficial aspects and doesn’t integrate itself into the body […]
The e-book age is here — infrastructure, readers, storefronts. Publishers should heed the warning signs and stop delaying the inevitable.
The OUP has launched Oxford Bibliographies Online, hoping to filter major fields down to a high-quality, peer-reviewed reference kick-start. But does a wordy filter actually filter in the networked world?
The failure of the traditional music industry has become the standard cautionary tale for content industries adapting to a digital era. But for scholarly publishers, many factors make the music industry a poor comparison. We have more in common with smaller niche markets. Watching their electronic experimentation and new business models may be more informative as we seek new strategies for presenting and selling content.
If consumer web sites remain the source of most health information, there is little that FRPAA will do to improve the transmission of research to the public.
A new Pew Research report shows that news media — print and broadcast — vary in their attitudes. But a deeper attitude about how the news should be presented may be their ultimate vulnerability.
Examine what you’re quoted carefully. Some commonly held views of the world are based on misappropriated quotations.
Major trends are at work in information exchange technologies and interface design, but publishers remain hampered by incumbent traits.
Four days with the iPad reveals a landscape of possibilities and some real functionality pros and cons.
Another German publisher tries to profit off printed Wikipedia entries, this time by flooding Amazon with POD compilations.
Print is alive, but demoted. This video argues the point in a lively and entertaining way.
The editor of “Vanity Fair” claims print isn’t dying. But the death metaphor obscures the reality — print isn’t as important as it once was.
We describe many aspects of studies, but “peer reviewed” is a generic label for a multitude of recipes. Maybe we should start listing what went into it.
The next new e-book reading device is already here. (You may already own one.)