Sci Foo Camp – Day 1
Sci Foo Camp 2009 kicked off last night with opening remarks by Tim O’Reilly (of O’Reilly Media), Timo Hannay (of Nature Publishing Group), and Larry Page (of Google).
Sci Foo Camp 2009 kicked off last night with opening remarks by Tim O’Reilly (of O’Reilly Media), Timo Hannay (of Nature Publishing Group), and Larry Page (of Google).
We’ve all read declaration after declaration that the publishing business model is dead and needs to be replaced by a new one. So far, no one seems to have any idea exactly what that new business model should be. A few recent examples are examined….
With scientific information propagating in new ways, is the Impact Factor measuring what it was intended to measure?
A new iPhone application lets you podcast from wherever you are. The results may open a new door on audio expression for many of us.
Hubspot’s new report on the Twittersphere looks grim at first glance. But, with some normal Web wisdom in hand, a second look proves fruitful.
Two new technologies are introduced, with very different scope and aims. As publishers, we need to think more like Wave and less like Bing.
When a group of publishers sits down to discuss social networking, there are many insights to be had.
Is the Google generation coming or are they already here? Why does it matter?
The SSP’s Annual Meeting is underway. That means more blogging from sessions, about sessions, and inspired by sessions.
The “Now Web” has emerged as a major alternative for users. Google is watching it, and you should be, too.
Twittering or following the SSP Annual Meeting? Use hash tag #SSP09.
Has free access to content outlived its usefulness as a way of getting noticed?
Twitter’s initial business model won’t be about advertising, proving again how different distribution is these days, and how well Twitter might understand this.
Should a federal agency start funding research into social networks? It might be the greatest idea since DARPA.
A recent study shows that article tagging actually decreases recall of content. This points out the inelegance of most social media tools, where the act of using the tool becomes paramount over the activity it’s supposed to aid.