Gaming the System: Do Promises of Citation Advantage Go Too Far?
Promises of more citations if authors pay are problematic in more ways than one.
Promises of more citations if authors pay are problematic in more ways than one.
A study by two respected economists suggests it may be time to admit that we made a mistake attributing a citation advantage to open access articles.
Stating that open access journals publish papers with “sound methodologies” promotes an unrealistic view of the scientific process and a corrupted image of the editorial and peer-review process.
A new review of the literature about open access’ effects on article citations attempts to rewrite the debate.
A new article suggests that institutional self-archiving mandates may benefit authors . . . if you ignore some inconsistent and inconvenient results.
European countries could save millions of Euros if they switched to open access publishing and self-archiving, a report suggests. But is this report based on valid assumptions?
Will $800 buy you a publication in a Bentham Science journal?
The debate over Open Access is not about science or economics but about core values and the language that embodies them.