[…] Blackwell Publishers, John Wiley & Sons, Frontiers Media, and AIP Publishing. At SSP’s New Directions Seminar, a panel examined how artificial intelligence is already active in the three core activities of scholarly communication: reading, writing, and reviewing. The premise was not […]
[…] in a journal not so far away, scientific review was the domain of humans alone. But now a new force, artificial intelligence (AI), has entered the scholarly galaxy. AI rises as both ally and adversary, with the power to bring balance […]
Last week saw the release of two court decisions in cases addressing the use of copyrighted material for training of artificial intelligence (AI) platforms, Bartz et al., v. Anthropic, and Kadrey et al., v. Meta. We asked the Chefs for their […]
[…] also leaves them paralyzed, uncertain, and fearful. A recent New Yorker article by D. Graham Burnett, “Will the Humanities Survive Artificial Intelligence”, looks at this strange new world. On campus, we are told, many are pretending that this revolution isn’t happening, […]
[…] long history of having to reimagine themselves and their services in the face of technological advancement. With the advent of artificial intelligence (AI) search and the use of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) in most commercially available search engines right now, we must […]
[…] great deal of the programming during the STM Conference and much of the programming around the fair was focused on artificial intelligence (AI) and its impacts on scholarly publishing. During the conference, I had an opportunity to speak at length with […]
A robust conversation has been brewing about licensing and artificial intelligence (AI). It isn’t the lawsuit question, which is pursuing apace and likely will lead in my estimation to some form of settlements for the majority of cases. The other conversation […]
[…] Nogueira and Jan Ove Rein, both from the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU). Leticia is project leader for artificial intelligence at the university library. Jan Ove is Senior Research Librarian and acts as a subject specialist for medicine, providing […]
[…] academic landscape, embrace innovation, and foster best practices. While highlighting the “Innovation and Technology in Peer Review,” it’s clear that artificial intelligence (AI) is shaping the future of scholarly communication. AI-powered tools and algorithms present exciting opportunities to boost efficiency, transparency, […]
[…] believe that licensing is strangely difficult. For example, in a response from Microsoft and GitHub to the US Copyright Office’s Artificial Intelligence Study, the parties stated: Any requirement to obtain consent for accessible works to be used for training would chill […]
[…] published. A BMJ study found that, in 2021, papermill retractions accounted for around 21.8 percent of total retractions. As generative artificial intelligence (AI) models become more sophisticated by learning from other submissions, we may see papermills produce content that appears more […]
[…] available on the STM website. The STM Trends 2028 Report Image It will come as no surprise to anyone that artificial intelligence was a key theme. How might the suite of tools that have entered the market in the past year […]
[…] We live at the intersections of science, technology, art, and design. We are one of the world’s leading publishers in artificial intelligence and machine learning, for example. We place extremely high value on book design, as a longtime leader in art […]
[…] is that I’m still learning. There’s so much to learn about today’s technologies and how we can apply things like artificial intelligence to scholarly communications. I learn something about software development nearly every day from my colleagues at Silverchair. Our clients […]
One of the great promises of artificial intelligence (AI) is the potential for their use in translation. Though once the stuff of science fiction, and an ideal route to filling plot holes to allow characters from different planets to interact (e.g., […]