[…] and provide updates on what is going on in the scholarly world globally, e.g., Plan S and the use of Artificial Intelligence in scholarly communication. As a secondary benefit, it also gives a country a sense of position − where its […]
[…] book chapter vs. some other type). Recent efforts to open references (i4oc) aim to take this research even further, and artificial intelligence and semantic tools may soon allow understanding not just of whether a reference is cited, but of how often, […]
[…] knowledge directly? And scientists won’t have to read and write all those (bloody) papers? More recently, we are told that Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Natural Language Processing will do all the reading and understanding for us: AI is going to eat […]
[…] (and how to implement a data review program). Other talks I found particularly useful included one covering practical implementations of artificial intelligence, and a look at just what Sci-Hub is doing and what publishers can do about it. If you really […]
Google’s journal about artificial intelligence (AI) coming from editors and authors associated with Google and Google Brain raises questions about conflicts, vanity publishing, and Google as a media company.
[…] past 20 years but in the career spans of these young professionals, further revolutions are coming as technologies such as artificial intelligence and machine learning become both powerful and ubiquitous. Encouragingly, all contributors see SSP — and themselves! — as part […]
[…] of connecting people with digital content will continue to evolve as we embrace new applications such as machine learning and artificial intelligence where more content finds us, rather than our having to find the content. __________________ Now, as usual, it’s your […]
[…] the past few years. In addition to funding bioRxiv, CZI has acquired the startup Meta with the goal of developing artificial intelligence (AI) technology to plumb scientific and scholarly content to find new and helpful connections. CZI’s involvement in Meta is […]
[…] the Internet, it’s getting much harder to detect if you’re a dog. Defenders of open peer review systems argue that Artificial Intelligence (AI) will help scientists sniff out and expose fake preprint reviews. Indeed, AI software has already been implemented into peer […]
[…] Nature. Peer reviews, like letters of recommendation, are opinions. Discussions along these lines inevitably lead to suggestions that with improved artificial intelligence (AI), we’ll reduce subjectivity through machine reading of papers and create a fairer system of peer review. O’Neil, in […]
[…] an argument that might look familiar to more recent critics of the ways that a rhetoric of “excellence” can create artificial barriers to fresh thinking: “Every time an engineering problem is approached with a pale, male design team, it may […]
[…] into their Facebook posts to increase the likelihood that their friends would see their posts in their News Feed. As artificial intelligence (AI) continues to develop, Boyd believes things are going to get much worse: If you don’t have a structure […]
[…] for-profit technology firms. This is a growing, if not new, trend, as The Wall Street Journal reported last year concerning artificial intelligence research. The question that nags me is, Why didn’t Elsevier and its cohorts get to this first? After all, […]
[…] experiment with different models of peer review, particularly those that increase transparency, encourage more diversity in the reviewer pool, utilize Artificial Intelligence, and those that support training and mentoring. Making the peer review process and experience better and more efficient is […]
[…] or double blind review, we have seen the rise of open peer review in some disciplines. And the use of artificial intelligence in peer review could be the next big thing. The main issue from my perspective is that peer review […]