AI Strategy, Governance, and Monetization in Scholarly Publishing: Lessons from Industry Front-Runners

[…] develop AI-powered research assistants or dynamic knowledge platforms for academic institutions. Managing Content Risks and IP Protection While generative AI opens doors for innovation, it also presents risks: Content Cannibalization: LLMs trained on proprietary scholarly content risk devaluing original publications […]

The Humanities as Canary: Understanding this Crisis Now

[…] knowledge and its application. As almost 2000 members of the National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine have signed an open letter stating that the administration in Washington has opened a “war on science” (not NASEM itself, which is hewing […]

Guest Post — Overcoming Skepticism Through Experimentation: The Role of AI in Transforming Peer Review

[…] training programs can improve the quality and consistency of evaluations, helping to reduce biases and enhance assessment skills. Additionally, adopting open peer review practices, where reviewer identities are disclosed, can foster accountability and encourage more constructive feedback. While these solutions […]

Innovation and Technology in Peer Review: Some User Perspectives

[…] process that is constantly evolving. I have experimented with various types of manuscript peer review, including double-blind, partial, or fully open review, with and without publication. In my belief, the peer review system will remain an important part of promoting […]