The Scholarly Kitchen

What’s Hot and Cooking In Scholarly Publishing

  • About
  • Archives
  • Collections
    Scholarly Publishing 101 -- The Basics
    Collections
    • Scholarly Publishing 101 -- The Basics
    • Academia
    • Business Models
    • Discovery and Access
    • Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility
    • Economics
    • Libraries
    • Marketing
    • Metrics and Analytics
    • Open Access
    • Organizational Management
    • Peer Review
    • Strategic Planning
    • Technology and Disruption
  • Chefs
  • Podcast
  • Follow

Archives: change the world

Ask The Chefs: Picking A Superpower!

With the world in chaos around us, this month we’ve asked the Chefs about superpowers! What would YOU select if you could pick any superpower? Let us know.

  • By Ann Michael
  • Mar 26, 2020
  • 6 Comments

Official Blog of:

Society for Scholarly Publishing (SSP)

The Chefs

  • Rick Anderson
  • Todd A Carpenter
  • Michael Clarke
  • Angela Cochran
  • Lettie Y. Conrad
  • David Crotty
  • Phil Davis
  • Joseph Esposito
  • Robert Harington
  • Siân Harris
  • Haseeb Irfanullah
  • Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe
  • Phill Jones
  • Scholarly Kitchen
  • Judy Luther
  • Alice Meadows
  • Ann Michael
  • Alison Mudditt
  • Jill O'Neill
  • Charlie Rapple
  • Dianndra Roberts
  • Roger C. Schonfeld
  • David Smith
  • Tao Tao
  • Tim Vines
  • Jasmine Wallace
  • Karin Wulf

Most Recent

  • Guest Post — Who Cares About Publication Integrity?
  • Still Ambiguous at Best? Revisiting “If We Don’t Know What Citations Mean, What Does it Mean When We Count Them”
  • Guest Post — Has Peer Review Created a Toxic Culture in Academia? Moving from ‘Battering’ to ‘Bettering’ in the Review of Academic Research

Recent Tweets

Retweet on Twitter Scholarly Kitchen Retweeted
bib_tugraz Bibliothek und Archiv der TU Graz @bib_tugraz ·
2h

Still Ambiguous at Best? Revisiting "If We Don’t Know What Citations Mean, What Does it Mean When We Count Them" https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2022/08/17/still-ambiguous-at-best-revisiting-if-we-dont-know-what-citations-mean-what-does-it-mean-when-we-count-them/ via @scholarlykitchn

Retweet on Twitter Scholarly Kitchen Retweeted
rschon Roger C. Schonfeld @rschon ·
1h

Today's piece in @scholarlykitchn suggests that publishers and academic institutions ultimately "don't care" about research integrity. While the argument may be offputtingly strident for the sector, there is something depressingly compelling about it. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2022/08/18/guest-post-who-cares-about-publication-integrity/

Retweet on Twitter Scholarly Kitchen Retweeted
academia_kmu Akhtar Sherin @academia_kmu ·
8h

Has #PeerReview Created a Toxic Culture in Academia? Moving from ‘Battering’ to ‘Bettering’ in the Review of #Academic #Research
@scholarlykitchn

https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2022/08/16/guest-post-has-peer-review-created-a-toxic-culture-in-academia-moving-from-battering-to-bettering-in-the-review-of-academic-research/ via @scholarlykitchn

Follow the Scholarly Kitchen Blog Follow Us
Society for Scholarly Publishing (SSP)

The mission of the Society for Scholarly Publishing (SSP) is to advance scholarly publishing and communication, and the professional development of its members through education, collaboration, and networking. SSP established The Scholarly Kitchen blog in February 2008 to keep SSP members and interested parties aware of new developments in publishing.

The Scholarly Kitchen is a moderated and independent blog. Opinions on The Scholarly Kitchen are those of the authors. They are not necessarily those held by the Society for Scholarly Publishing nor by their respective employers.

  • About
  • Archives
  • Chefs
  • Podcast
  • Follow
  • Advertising
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Website Credits
ISSN 2690-8085