An Old-Age Problem Among Reviewers?
Are older reviewers more cursory in their reviews? A study by the editor of the Annals of Emergency Medicine suggests as much.
Are older reviewers more cursory in their reviews? A study by the editor of the Annals of Emergency Medicine suggests as much.
Providing incentives to reviewers may be key to improving the peer review process.
A common systemic problem links oversight of financial risks and author-pays peer-review. Both are potentially calamitous.
The journal that sparked a peer-review controversy has resumed publishing its ousted editor’s work.
Will $800 buy you a publication in a Bentham Science journal?
The Bentham experiment suggests that a poorly managed payment system may be the root of a larger problem emerging in academic publishing.
No new editor, a submission stop, and an announcement to authors to select another journal. As if this weren’t enough, the backlog of unpublished manuscripts is being cleared at an unprecedented rate.
An embattled math journal resumes publishing without its editor. Is this journal preparing to close shop?
Publisher asks for submission stop while searching for new editor-in-chief.
A journal begins requiring authors to submit peer-reviewed pages to Wikipedia. Is this a great idea?
The Research Assessment Exercise is slow and expensive. Abandoning peer-review for quantitative assessment may lead to excessive gaming and corrupt the indicators of quality.
The abuse of editorial power and favoritism leads to a national scandal in France.
Scholarly publishers risk following the newspaper industry if they don’t value peer-review.
What can be learned about science and publishing from the El Naschie controversy?
Controversial self-publishing editor, El Naschie, to step down in 2009. Professional affiliations cast in doubt.