The Scholarly Kitchen

What’s Hot and Cooking In Scholarly Publishing

  • About
  • Archives
  • Collections
    Scholarly Publishing 101 -- The Basics
    Collections
    • Scholarly Publishing 101 -- The Basics
    • Academia
    • Business Models
    • Discovery and Access
    • Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility
    • Economics
    • Libraries
    • Marketing
    • Mental Health Awareness
    • Metrics and Analytics
    • Open Access
    • Organizational Management
    • Peer Review
    • Strategic Planning
    • Technology and Disruption
  • Translations
    topographic world map
    Translations
    • All Translations
    • Chinese
    • German
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Spanish
  • Chefs
  • Podcast
  • Follow

Archives: Wellcome Trust

PubMed Central's Failures in Handling Conflicts of Interest with eLife

One of the layers of impropriety regarding PubMed Central’s handling of eLife is its mismanagement of conflicts of interest.

  • By Kent Anderson
  • Nov 15, 2012
  • 12 Comments
  • Time To Read: 5 mins

PubMed Central or OA Central — More Strange Behaviors at PMC and NLM Paint a Portrait of Biases and Poor Process

More information emerges about PubMed Central, its processes, its relationship with eLife, and its role as a technology provider. Overall, it looks like certain OA friends get special treatment, and the processes you think occur are often short-circuited and may not even be tracked.

  • By Kent Anderson
  • Oct 29, 2012
  • 21 Comments
  • Time To Read: 10 mins

Something’s Rotten in Bethesda — The Troubling Tale of PubMed Central, PubMed, and eLife

Last week, PubMed Central became the primary and sole publisher of eLife content, putting its competition with publishers, its manipulation of PubMed indexing criteria, its competition with publishing technology companies, and its clear OA bias into stark relief.

  • By Kent Anderson
  • Oct 22, 2012
  • 63 Comments
  • Time To Read: 14 mins

Recuse, Refuse, or Excuse — The Conflicts of Interest at the Heart of Funder-Backed Journals

Funder-sponsored journals raise important conflict of interest questions, and may be fundamentally untenable in an industry that requires independent third-party evaluation of research reports.

  • By Kent Anderson
  • Oct 17, 2012
  • 39 Comments
  • Time To Read: 6 mins

The "Academic Spring" — Shallow Rhetoric Aimed at the Wrong Target

In another rhetorical land grab, OA activists are aligning themselves with the Arab Spring by claiming their boycotts are the start of an “academic spring.” Not only are the two not comparable, but obviously the wrong target of oppression and exploitation has been identified.

  • By Kent Anderson
  • Apr 12, 2012
  • 75 Comments
  • Time To Read: 5 mins

eLife: Can a Top-Tier Journal Run Without Professional Help?

Can a new open access journal that relies on working scientists to oversee its review process compete with other top-tier journals that employ professional editors?

  • By Phil Davis
  • Dec 1, 2011
  • 17 Comments
  • Time To Read: 4 mins

OA Rhetoric, Economics, and the Definition of "Research"

Rhetoric can’t hide financial realities. Is trading research for access a good use of funds?

  • By Rick Anderson
  • Sep 7, 2011
  • 24 Comments
  • Time To Read: 5 mins

Top-Tier Open Access Journal Arrives with Fanfare, Few Details

A new open access journal announced with much fanfare, but with few details, no name and no business plan.

  • By Phil Davis
  • Jun 27, 2011
  • 26 Comments
  • Time To Read: < 1 min

Posts pagination

Prev 1 2

Official Blog of:

Society for Scholarly Publishing (SSP)

The Chefs

  • Rick Anderson
  • Todd A Carpenter
  • Angela Cochran
  • Lettie Y. Conrad
  • David Crotty
  • Joseph Esposito
  • Roohi Ghosh
  • Robert Harington
  • Haseeb Irfanullah
  • Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe
  • Phill Jones
  • Roy Kaufman
  • Scholarly Kitchen
  • Stephanie Lovegrove Hansen
  • Alice Meadows
  • Alison Mudditt
  • Jill O'Neill
  • Charlie Rapple
  • Dianndra Roberts
  • Maryam Sayab
  • Roger C. Schonfeld
  • Avi Staiman
  • Randy Townsend
  • Tim Vines
  • Hong Zhou

Interested in writing for The Scholarly Kitchen? Learn more.

Most Recent

  • STM Plants a Flag About Responsible Use of Research Content in GenAI
  • Guest Post — Could AI Help Fix Peer Review, or Will it Only Make Things Worse?
  • Guest Post — Academic Freedom Under Pressure: What Academic Publishers Can Do

SSP News

2026–2027 SSP Board of Directors Election Open

Mar 18, 2026

President’s Letter | March 2026

Mar 18, 2026

New Resource: Scholarly Publishing Position Glossary Brings Clarity to Publishing Careers

Mar 17, 2026
Follow the Scholarly Kitchen Blog Follow Us
Society for Scholarly Publishing (SSP)

The mission of the Society for Scholarly Publishing (SSP) is to advance scholarly publishing and communication, and the professional development of its members through education, collaboration, and networking. SSP established The Scholarly Kitchen blog in February 2008 to keep SSP members and interested parties aware of new developments in publishing.

The Scholarly Kitchen is a moderated and independent blog. Opinions on The Scholarly Kitchen are those of the authors. They are not necessarily those held by the Society for Scholarly Publishing nor by their respective employers.

  • About
  • Archives
  • Chefs
  • Podcast
  • Follow
  • Advertising
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Website Credits
ISSN 2690-8085